BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 32Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai41Delhi39Bangalore22Indore13Ahmedabad9Kolkata9SC8Hyderabad8Pune7Chennai6Visakhapatnam3Karnataka2Cochin2Cuttack1Rajkot1Surat1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 326Section 2633Depreciation3Addition to Income3

THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 1,, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE ANDHRA PRADESH PAPER MILLS LTD.,, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed and the cross objections filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 4/VIZ/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri T.M. Shiv Kumar – AdvFor Respondent: Shri T.S.N. Murthy – CIT DR
Section 263Section 32

32A and section 8ORRA. Tribunal agreed with the argument of the assessee that idea of not mentioning the word electricity in section 80IA(4)(iv) was only for the purpose that the legislature wanted to give the word power a wider meaning. Once the Legislature has not used the word electricity in the section, the Courts cannot put in this

THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 1,, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE ANDHRA PRADESH PAPER MILLS LTD.,, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed and the cross objections filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 5/VIZ/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Oct 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri T.M. Shiv Kumar – AdvFor Respondent: Shri T.S.N. Murthy – CIT DR
Section 263Section 32

32A and section 8ORRA. Tribunal agreed with the argument of the assessee that idea of not mentioning the word electricity in section 80IA(4)(iv) was only for the purpose that the legislature wanted to give the word power a wider meaning. Once the Legislature has not used the word electricity in the section, the Courts cannot put in this

THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 1,, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE ANDHRA PRADESH PAPER MILLS LTD.,, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed and the cross objections filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 6/VIZ/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Oct 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri T.M. Shiv Kumar – AdvFor Respondent: Shri T.S.N. Murthy – CIT DR
Section 263Section 32

32A and section 8ORRA. Tribunal agreed with the argument of the assessee that idea of not mentioning the word electricity in section 80IA(4)(iv) was only for the purpose that the legislature wanted to give the word power a wider meaning. Once the Legislature has not used the word electricity in the section, the Courts cannot put in this