Search: capital gains

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 292Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)8 Section 1488 Section 142(1)7 Section 50C4 Section 143(3)4 Section 1323 Section 153A3 Search & Seizure3 Section 127(2)(a)

MEKA RANGANAYAKAMMA,KRISHNA DISTRICT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 119/VIZ/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam22 Jan 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri GVN Hari, ARFor Respondent: Sri Madhukar Aves, Sr. AR

Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 50CSection 50GSection 54G

capital gains based on the value in the registered sale deed and not by adopting the provisions of section 50C of the Act. Accordingly, the Ld. AO has considered that the assessee has concealed the particulars of income while filing the return of income which attracts the penal provisions as per section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Further

MEKA RANGANAYAKAMMA,KRISHNA DISTRICT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), VIJAYAWADA

MEKA RANGANAYAKAMMA,KRISHNA DISTRICT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), VIJAYAWADA

M.RAGHURAMA RAJU L/R OF (LATE) M RADHA MOHAN RAJU,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), , VISAKHAPATNAM

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. HARI PRASAD BHARARIA, VISAKHAPATNAM

SRI GOLUGURI NAGI REDDY,VIJAYAWADA vs. AASISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJAHMUNDRY

SRI GOLUGURI NAGI REDDY,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY