SMT. L SUDHA BALA, L/R OF LATE SRI L.NARSA REDDY,GUNTUR vs. THE DCIT, SPECIAL RANGE GUNTUR, GUNTUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.260 & 261/Viz/2012 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years :1984-85 & 1985-86 Respectively) L.Sudha Bala Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of L/R Of Late Sri L Narasa Reddy Income Tax Prop.Sri Venkateswara Agro Chemicals Special Range Industries Guntur 2-14-101, Syamala Nagar 2Nd Lane, Guntur [Pan : Acgpl2351P] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

bogus purchases and the disallowance u/s 40A(3) in the assessment made u/s 143(3) required to be deleted. The Ld.AR also relied on the decision of Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court of A.P. and Telangana in the case of Swarna Andhra IJMII Integrated Township Development Private Limited, Hyderabad, in ITTA No.165 of 2014 dated 12/03/2014. 10 I.T.A. Nos260 & 261

SMT. L SUDHA BALA, L/R OF LATE SRI L.NARSA REDDY,GUNTUR vs. THE DCIT, SPECIAL RANGE GUNTUR, GUNTUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.260 & 261/Viz/2012 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years :1984-85 & 1985-86 Respectively) L.Sudha Bala Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of L/R Of Late Sri L Narasa Reddy Income Tax Prop.Sri Venkateswara Agro Chemicals Special Range Industries Guntur 2-14-101, Syamala Nagar 2Nd Lane, Guntur [Pan : Acgpl2351P] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

bogus purchases and the disallowance u/s 40A(3) in the assessment made u/s 143(3) required to be deleted. The Ld.AR also relied on the decision of Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court of A.P. and Telangana in the case of Swarna Andhra IJMII Integrated Township Development Private Limited, Hyderabad, in ITTA No.165 of 2014 dated 12/03/2014. 10 I.T.A. Nos260 & 261

GVA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHHATTISGARH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

Survey action u/s 133A in the cases of the alleged\nsuppliers, the fact of availing accommodation entries by the assessee company\nin the guise of purchases, would not have come to light and the modus\noperandi of the assessee company would not have beenunearthed.\n10.\nReliance is placed on the recent decision of Hon'ble High Court of\nBombay

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. GVA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., DHAMTARI

Survey action u/s 133A in the cases of the alleged\nsuppliers, the fact of availing accommodation entries by the assessee company\nin the guise of purchases, would not have come to light and the modus\noperandi of the assessee company would not have beenunearthed.\n10.\nReliance is placed on the recent decision of Hon'ble High Court of\nBombay

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. GVA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., DHAMTARI

Survey action u/s 133A in the cases of the alleged\nsuppliers, the fact of availing accommodation entries by the assessee company\nin the guise of purchases, would not have come to light and the modus\noperandi of the assessee company would not have beenunearthed.\n10.\nReliance is placed on the recent decision of Hon'ble High Court of\nBombay

GVA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHHATTISGARH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

Survey action u/s 133A in the cases of the alleged\nsuppliers, the fact of availing accommodation entries by the assessee company\nin the guise of purchases, would not have come to light and the modus\noperandi of the assessee company would not have beenunearthed.\n10.\nReliance is placed on the recent decision of Hon'ble High Court of\nBombay

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Us:

purchase transactions, raised serious doubts regarding the authenticity of the subject loan transaction in question. Vedumutha Electricals India Private Limited. 20. Considering the totality of the facts involved in the present case before us, we are of the firm conviction that the CIT(A) ought not to have summarily accepted the claim of the assessee company that it had raised

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Us:

purchase transactions, raised serious doubts regarding the authenticity of the subject loan transaction in question. Vedumutha Electricals India Private Limited. 20. Considering the totality of the facts involved in the present case before us, we are of the firm conviction that the CIT(A) ought not to have summarily accepted the claim of the assessee company that it had raised

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Us:

purchase transactions, raised serious doubts regarding the authenticity of the subject loan transaction in question. Vedumutha Electricals India Private Limited. 20. Considering the totality of the facts involved in the present case before us, we are of the firm conviction that the CIT(A) ought not to have summarily accepted the claim of the assessee company that it had raised

ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Us:

purchase transactions, raised serious doubts regarding the authenticity of the subject loan transaction in question. Vedumutha Electricals India Private Limited. 20. Considering the totality of the facts involved in the present case before us, we are of the firm conviction that the CIT(A) ought not to have summarily accepted the claim of the assessee company that it had raised

ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1),, VIJAYAWADA vs. VEDMUTHA ELECTRICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, all the captioned appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Us:

purchase transactions, raised serious doubts regarding the authenticity of the subject loan transaction in question. Vedumutha Electricals India Private Limited. 20. Considering the totality of the facts involved in the present case before us, we are of the firm conviction that the CIT(A) ought not to have summarily accepted the claim of the assessee company that it had raised

GVA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHHATTISGARH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

Survey action u/s 133A in the cases of the alleged\nsuppliers, the fact of availing accommodation entries by the assessee company\nin the guise of purchases, would not have come to light and the modus\noperandi of the assessee company would not have beenunearthed.\n10. Reliance is placed on the recent decision of Hon'ble High Court of\nBombay

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. GVA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., DHAMTARI

Survey action u/s 133A in the cases of the alleged\nsuppliers, the fact of availing accommodation entries by the assessee company\nin the guise of purchases, would not have come to light and the modus\noperandi of the assessee company would not have beenunearthed.\n10.\nReliance is placed on the recent decision of Hon'ble High Court of\nBombay

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. HIRAPANNA JEWELLERS , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the revenue as well as cross objection filed by the assessee on this issue are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.523/Viz/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year:2016-17) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Hirapanna Jewellers Income Tax D.No.48-19-5, Opp : Apsrtc Central Circle-1 Commercial Complex Visakhapatnam Dwarakanagar Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aaifh2606M] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co No.16/Viz/2019 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. No.523/Viz/2018) (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year:2016-17) M/S Hirapanna Jewellers Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.48-19-5, Opp : Apsrtc Income Tax Commercial Complex Central Circle-1 Dwarakanagar Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aaifh2606M] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 08.04.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23.04.2019

133A was conducted on 24.11.2015 and during the course of survey excess stock of 2725.742 gms gold ornaments were found. The assessee could not explain the reason for excess stock as on the date of survey, however, subsequently, the assessee produced the bill for receipt of gold jewellery from M/s Jai Mata Di 7 I.T.A. No.523/Viz/2018 and CO No.16/Viz/2019

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR vs. VENKATRAMA POULTRIES PVT. LTD., GUNTUR

133A of the Act for the 15 premises.\nDuring the course of search proceedings, the search team noticed that assessee\ngenerated unaccounted income by way of production suppression of eggs and the\nPage No. 3\nITA Nos. 228, 229, 230 & 231/VIZ/2025\nC.O. Nos. 19, 20, 21 & 22/VIZ/2025\nVenkatrama Poultries Pvt Ltd.,\nsame are sold outside the books of accounts

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUNTUR vs. VENKATRAMA POULTRIES PVT. LTD, GUNTUR

133A of the Act for the 15 premises.\nDuring the course of search proceedings, the search team noticed that assessee\ngenerated unaccounted income by way of production suppression of eggs and the\nPage No. 3\nITA Nos. 228, 229, 230 & 231/VIZ/2025\nC.O. Nos. 19, 20, 21 & 22/VIZ/2025\nVenkatrama Poultries Pvt Ltd., 552\nsame are sold outside the books of accounts

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR vs. VENKATRAMA POULTRIES PVT. LTD., GUNTUR

133A of the Act for the 15 premises.\nDuring the course of search proceedings, the search team noticed that assessee\ngenerated unaccounted income by way of production suppression of eggs and the\nPage No. 3\nITA Nos. 228, 229, 230 & 231/VIZ/2025\nC.O. Nos. 19, 20, 21 & 22/VIZ/2025\nVenkatrama Poultries Pvt Ltd.,\nsame are sold outside the books of accounts

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR vs. VENKATRAMA POULTRIES PVT LTD, GUNTUR

133A of the Act for the 15 premises.\nDuring the course of search proceedings, the search team noticed that assessee\ngenerated unaccounted income by way of production suppression of eggs and the\nPage No. 3\nITA Nos. 228, 229, 230 & 231/VIZ/2025\nC.O. Nos. 19, 20, 21 & 22/VIZ/2025\nVenkatrama Poultries Pvt Ltd.,\nsame are sold outside the books of accounts

INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. QUALITY STEEL SHOPPE PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the Cross Objection No

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.454/Viz/2024 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19) Income Tax Officer, Vs. Quality Steel Shoppe Ward-2(1), Private Limited, Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaacq1115D (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 18/Viz/2024 (In आ.अपी.सं /454/Viz/2024) ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19)

bogus purchases, the assessee company vide its reply dated 08/01/2024 rebutted the same. It was submitted by the assessee company that during the Financial Year 2017-18, M/s. Steel Exchange India Limited (SEIL) had sold 998.870 mts of MS bars to M/s. Hero Wiretex Private Limited but had not taken the delivery of inventory due to non-payment of sale

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. MUTYALA JEWELLERS,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the cross objection filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru R L Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S. Balakrishnan, Hon'Ble

bogus nature of the bills. 4. The CIT(A) ought to have observed that the explanation given by the assessee in the statement recorded u/s 131 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, that some purchases are not recorded in the purchase register has no value in the absence of details thereof. 5. The CIT(A) ought to have observed that