Search: bogus purchases

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 268Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Kolkata13 Delhi3 Mumbai2 Visakhapatnam2 Jaipur1 Ahmedabad1 Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)2 Section 143(2)2 Section 133A2 Section 682 Capital Gains2 Penny Stock2 Unexplained Cash Credit2 Addition to Income2 Survey u/s 133A2

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPTNAM vs. MATTAPALLI RAMGOPAL,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 65/VIZ/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam29 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.65/Viz/2021 & 66/Viz/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 & 2015-16) Asst.Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. Mattapalli Ramgopal Circle-1(1) 25-8-246, Main Road Visakhapatnam Kurupam Market Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aarpw2133K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri I.Kama Sastry, ARFor Respondent: Shri O.N.Hari Prasada Rao, DR

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 68

purchase and sale of gold jewellery and silverware. The assessee filed his return of income for the A.Y.2014-15 on 18.09.2014, declaring total income at Rs.61,58,100/-. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”). Subsequently, the case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and accordingly, statutory notice

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPTNAM vs. MATTAPALLI RAMGOPAL,, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPTNAM vs. MATTAPALLI RAMGOPAL,, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. MATTAPALLI RAMGOPAL, VISAKHAPATNAM