BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15 results for “bogus purchases”+ Condonation of Delayclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai443Kolkata273Chennai173Delhi134Karnataka100Ahmedabad84Pune77Jaipur67Surat59Bangalore46Calcutta42Hyderabad35Amritsar35Chandigarh28Raipur19Nagpur18Lucknow17Indore16Visakhapatnam15Cuttack14Rajkot10Varanasi5Patna5Jodhpur4Agra3Dehradun3Allahabad3Telangana3Jabalpur2Cochin2Guwahati1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 13224Section 143(3)11Section 1278Section 153A8Section 1478Search & Seizure8Section 143(2)5Condonation of Delay5Section 1314

SMT. L SUDHA BALA, L/R OF LATE SRI L.NARSA REDDY,GUNTUR vs. THE DCIT, SPECIAL RANGE GUNTUR, GUNTUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 261/VIZ/2012[1985-86]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam07 Dec 2018AY 1985-86

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.260 & 261/Viz/2012 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years :1984-85 & 1985-86 Respectively) L.Sudha Bala Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of L/R Of Late Sri L Narasa Reddy Income Tax Prop.Sri Venkateswara Agro Chemicals Special Range Industries Guntur 2-14-101, Syamala Nagar 2Nd Lane, Guntur [Pan : Acgpl2351P] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri C.Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Suman Malik, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 40A(3)

delay is condoned. 2. The assessee filed appeal raising the following grounds along with Form No.36. (1) On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble Commissioner of Income Tax is not correct in law or on facts in upholding the reopening of the assessment u/s 148 of the Act though the reasons recorded for reopening of assessment

Section 1484
Bogus Purchases2
Reopening of Assessment2

SMT. L SUDHA BALA, L/R OF LATE SRI L.NARSA REDDY,GUNTUR vs. THE DCIT, SPECIAL RANGE GUNTUR, GUNTUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 260/VIZ/2012[1984-85]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam07 Dec 2018AY 1984-85

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.260 & 261/Viz/2012 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years :1984-85 & 1985-86 Respectively) L.Sudha Bala Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of L/R Of Late Sri L Narasa Reddy Income Tax Prop.Sri Venkateswara Agro Chemicals Special Range Industries Guntur 2-14-101, Syamala Nagar 2Nd Lane, Guntur [Pan : Acgpl2351P] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri C.Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Suman Malik, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 40A(3)

delay is condoned. 2. The assessee filed appeal raising the following grounds along with Form No.36. (1) On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble Commissioner of Income Tax is not correct in law or on facts in upholding the reopening of the assessment u/s 148 of the Act though the reasons recorded for reopening of assessment

SHYAM SUNDAR POLISETTY,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the AY 2013-

ITA 262/VIZ/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 260 To 267/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2020-21)

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

condone the delay of 58 days in filing all the present appeals of the assessee before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeals on merits. 4. Firstly, we shall take up the appeal ITA No.260/Viz/2023 for the AY 2013-14 as a lead appeal. 5. Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant

SHYAM SUNDAR POLISETTY,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the AY 2013-

ITA 264/VIZ/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 260 To 267/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2020-21)

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

condone the delay of 58 days in filing all the present appeals of the assessee before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeals on merits. 4. Firstly, we shall take up the appeal ITA No.260/Viz/2023 for the AY 2013-14 as a lead appeal. 5. Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant

SHYAM SUNDAR POLISETTY,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the AY 2013-

ITA 260/VIZ/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 260 To 267/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2020-21)

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

condone the delay of 58 days in filing all the present appeals of the assessee before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeals on merits. 4. Firstly, we shall take up the appeal ITA No.260/Viz/2023 for the AY 2013-14 as a lead appeal. 5. Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant

SHYAM SUNDAR POLISETTY ,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the AY 2013-

ITA 261/VIZ/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 260 To 267/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2020-21)

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

condone the delay of 58 days in filing all the present appeals of the assessee before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeals on merits. 4. Firstly, we shall take up the appeal ITA No.260/Viz/2023 for the AY 2013-14 as a lead appeal. 5. Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant

SHYAM SUNDAR POLISETTY ,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the AY 2013-

ITA 266/VIZ/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 260 To 267/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2020-21)

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

condone the delay of 58 days in filing all the present appeals of the assessee before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeals on merits. 4. Firstly, we shall take up the appeal ITA No.260/Viz/2023 for the AY 2013-14 as a lead appeal. 5. Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant

SHYAM SUNDAR POLISETTY,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the AY 2013-

ITA 267/VIZ/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 260 To 267/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2020-21)

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

condone the delay of 58 days in filing all the present appeals of the assessee before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeals on merits. 4. Firstly, we shall take up the appeal ITA No.260/Viz/2023 for the AY 2013-14 as a lead appeal. 5. Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant

SHYAM SUNDAR POLISETTY,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the AY 2013-

ITA 265/VIZ/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 260 To 267/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2020-21)

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

condone the delay of 58 days in filing all the present appeals of the assessee before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeals on merits. 4. Firstly, we shall take up the appeal ITA No.260/Viz/2023 for the AY 2013-14 as a lead appeal. 5. Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant

SHYAM SUNDAR POLISETTY,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the AY 2013-

ITA 263/VIZ/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Feb 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 260 To 267/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2020-21)

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

condone the delay of 58 days in filing all the present appeals of the assessee before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeals on merits. 4. Firstly, we shall take up the appeal ITA No.260/Viz/2023 for the AY 2013-14 as a lead appeal. 5. Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED, , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue as well as the assessee and cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 475/VIZ/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Apr 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.415 & 416/Viz/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.474 & 475/Viz/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Radhika Vegetable Income Tax Oils(P) Ltd., Circle-3(1) Sreeram Nagar Visakhapatnam Garividi, Vizianagaram [Pan : Aaacr8333C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co No.132 & 133/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.474/Viz/2018 & 475/Viz/2018 Respectively) (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2014-15) Z M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt Suman Malik, Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 16.04.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30 .04.2019

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Smt Suman Malik, DR
Section 131Section 143(2)

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted. 2. These appeals are filed by the assessee and the revenue against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]-1, Visakhapatnam, vide I.T.A.No.0009/2016-17/ACIT-C-3(1),VSP/2017-18 dated 21.06.2018 and I.T.A.No.10409/2016-17/ACIT-C-3(1), VSP/2017-18 dated 21.06.2018. Cross Objections are also filed by the assessee supporting

RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue as well as the assessee and cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 415/VIZ/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Apr 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.415 & 416/Viz/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.474 & 475/Viz/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Radhika Vegetable Income Tax Oils(P) Ltd., Circle-3(1) Sreeram Nagar Visakhapatnam Garividi, Vizianagaram [Pan : Aaacr8333C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co No.132 & 133/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.474/Viz/2018 & 475/Viz/2018 Respectively) (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2014-15) Z M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt Suman Malik, Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 16.04.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30 .04.2019

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Smt Suman Malik, DR
Section 131Section 143(2)

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted. 2. These appeals are filed by the assessee and the revenue against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]-1, Visakhapatnam, vide I.T.A.No.0009/2016-17/ACIT-C-3(1),VSP/2017-18 dated 21.06.2018 and I.T.A.No.10409/2016-17/ACIT-C-3(1), VSP/2017-18 dated 21.06.2018. Cross Objections are also filed by the assessee supporting

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED, , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue as well as the assessee and cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 474/VIZ/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Apr 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.415 & 416/Viz/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.474 & 475/Viz/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Radhika Vegetable Income Tax Oils(P) Ltd., Circle-3(1) Sreeram Nagar Visakhapatnam Garividi, Vizianagaram [Pan : Aaacr8333C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co No.132 & 133/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.474/Viz/2018 & 475/Viz/2018 Respectively) (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2014-15) Z M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt Suman Malik, Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 16.04.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30 .04.2019

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Smt Suman Malik, DR
Section 131Section 143(2)

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted. 2. These appeals are filed by the assessee and the revenue against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]-1, Visakhapatnam, vide I.T.A.No.0009/2016-17/ACIT-C-3(1),VSP/2017-18 dated 21.06.2018 and I.T.A.No.10409/2016-17/ACIT-C-3(1), VSP/2017-18 dated 21.06.2018. Cross Objections are also filed by the assessee supporting

RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue as well as the assessee and cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 416/VIZ/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Apr 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.415 & 416/Viz/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.474 & 475/Viz/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Radhika Vegetable Income Tax Oils(P) Ltd., Circle-3(1) Sreeram Nagar Visakhapatnam Garividi, Vizianagaram [Pan : Aaacr8333C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co No.132 & 133/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.474/Viz/2018 & 475/Viz/2018 Respectively) (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2014-15) Z M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt Suman Malik, Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 16.04.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30 .04.2019

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Smt Suman Malik, DR
Section 131Section 143(2)

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted. 2. These appeals are filed by the assessee and the revenue against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]-1, Visakhapatnam, vide I.T.A.No.0009/2016-17/ACIT-C-3(1),VSP/2017-18 dated 21.06.2018 and I.T.A.No.10409/2016-17/ACIT-C-3(1), VSP/2017-18 dated 21.06.2018. Cross Objections are also filed by the assessee supporting

SRI RAJANI GOLD,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 162/VIZ/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam11 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.162/Viz/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2017-18) Sri Rajani Gold V. Asst. Cit – Circle – 1(1) D.No. 11-49-336B Central Revenue Building Sivalayam Street, I Town Mg Road – 520001 Vijayawada – 520001 Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aacfs6675E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)

condone the delay of 65 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeal on merits in the following paragraphs. 4. Brief facts of the case are that, assessee-firm is carrying on business of bullion trading in gold and silver and trading in gold ornaments and silver articles and filed its return of income