VIKAS EDUCATRIONAL SOCIETY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ITO, WARD - 3(2),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.385/Viz/2014 & I.T.A.No.386/Viz/2014 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2009-10 & 2010-11) M/S Vikas Educational Society Vs. The Income Tax Officer D.No.8-1-97/1/8, Ninitaas High Ward-3(2) Pedawaltair Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aaatv 3260F] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri Kjd Srinivas, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 05.09.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30.10.2019

section 40(a)(ia) are squarely applicable and we, do not find any infirmity in the order of the Ld.CIT(A) accordingly, we up hold the 17 I.T.A. No.385/Viz/2014 and 386/Viz/2014, A.Y.2009-10 & 2010-11 M/s Vikas Educational Society, Visakhapatnam order of the Ld.CIT(A). The appeal of the assessee on this ground is dismissed. 11.3. This expenditure of rent, debited

VISWATEJA SPINNING MILLS PVT LTD,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), WARD-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.575, 576, 577 & 578/Viz/2025 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Years:2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Vs. Viswateja Spinning Mills (P.) Ltd., Income Tax Officer (Tds) -Ward – 1 Boyapalem Village Income Tax Office Boyapalem To Phirangipuram Road Cr Buildings, Kannavari Thota Venkayalapadu Post Guntur – 522001 Edlapadu Mandalam Andhra Pradesh Guntur District – 522233 Andhra Pradesh [Pan:Aabcv8759M] करदाता का प्रतततितित्व/ Assessee Represented By : Shri Gvn Hari, Advocate राजस्व का प्रतततितित्व/ Department Represented By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr.Ar

TDS) v. Priya Blue Industries (P.) Ltd., (2016) 65 Taxmann.com 206 (Gujarat). Page. No 5 I.T.A.Nos.575, 576, 577 & 578/VIZ/2025 Viswateja Spinning Mills (P.) Ltd., 10. He further submitted that various judicial pronouncements relied on by the assessee has clearly confirmed the ratio, when the waste are usable as such, they do not fall within the definition of scrap

VISWATEJA SPINNING MILLS PVT LTD,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), WARD-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.575, 576, 577 & 578/Viz/2025 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Years:2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Vs. Viswateja Spinning Mills (P.) Ltd., Income Tax Officer (Tds) -Ward – 1 Boyapalem Village Income Tax Office Boyapalem To Phirangipuram Road Cr Buildings, Kannavari Thota Venkayalapadu Post Guntur – 522001 Edlapadu Mandalam Andhra Pradesh Guntur District – 522233 Andhra Pradesh [Pan:Aabcv8759M] करदाता का प्रतततितित्व/ Assessee Represented By : Shri Gvn Hari, Advocate राजस्व का प्रतततितित्व/ Department Represented By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr.Ar

TDS) v. Priya Blue Industries (P.) Ltd., (2016) 65 Taxmann.com 206 (Gujarat). Page. No 5 I.T.A.Nos.575, 576, 577 & 578/VIZ/2025 Viswateja Spinning Mills (P.) Ltd., 10. He further submitted that various judicial pronouncements relied on by the assessee has clearly confirmed the ratio, when the waste are usable as such, they do not fall within the definition of scrap

VISWATEJA SPINNING MILLS PVT LTD,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), WARD-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.575, 576, 577 & 578/Viz/2025 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Years:2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Vs. Viswateja Spinning Mills (P.) Ltd., Income Tax Officer (Tds) -Ward – 1 Boyapalem Village Income Tax Office Boyapalem To Phirangipuram Road Cr Buildings, Kannavari Thota Venkayalapadu Post Guntur – 522001 Edlapadu Mandalam Andhra Pradesh Guntur District – 522233 Andhra Pradesh [Pan:Aabcv8759M] करदाता का प्रतततितित्व/ Assessee Represented By : Shri Gvn Hari, Advocate राजस्व का प्रतततितित्व/ Department Represented By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr.Ar

TDS) v. Priya Blue Industries (P.) Ltd., (2016) 65 Taxmann.com 206 (Gujarat). Page. No 5 I.T.A.Nos.575, 576, 577 & 578/VIZ/2025 Viswateja Spinning Mills (P.) Ltd., 10. He further submitted that various judicial pronouncements relied on by the assessee has clearly confirmed the ratio, when the waste are usable as such, they do not fall within the definition of scrap

SRI KOTI LINGA HARI HARA MAHAKSHETRAM TEMPLE,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WD, RAJAHMUNDRY

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.365/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16) Sri Koti Linga Hari Hara Vs. Income Tax Officer, Mahakshetram Temple, Exemption Ward, Visakhapatnam. Rajahmundry. Pan: Acgfs3064C (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee By: Sri Cr Hemanth Kumar, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of 03/11/2025 Hearing: घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 07/11/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, Jm :

section 65 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, and therefore, form part of the corpus and are not liable to tax under the Income-tax Act.” 2. Succinctly stated, the Assessing Officer based on the information available with the department noted that during the AY 2015-16 cash deposits aggregating to Rs.1

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DODDI ROOPA, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.413/Viz/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2019-20) Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. Smt. Doddi Roopa, Income Tax, Visakhapatnam. Circle-3(1), Visakhapatnam. Pan: Atfpr7237N (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Gvn Hari, Advocate राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Shri Badicala Yadagiri, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 15/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 10/12/2025 Pronouncement:

TDS) on the payments made to M/s. A.K. Capital Enterprises, as against the purchases made during the year under consideration. Accordingly, the AO, based on his conviction that 4 DCIT vs. Smt. Doddi Roopa the assessee has failed to justify the purchases of Rs. 4,99,65,247/-, passed an order under section

SRI KEERTHI PROJECTS ,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.164/Viz/2023 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2018-19) Sri Keerthi Projects Vs. Income Tax Officer 3-20-14, Near Recruiting Office Ward-1(1) Pattabhipuram Guntur Guntur [Pan : Abjfs1107Q] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

TDS Credit thereon of Rs.11,65,105/- given. 3. Disallowance of Rs.1,61,015/- u/s 40(a)(ia) on payment of interest of Rs.5,36,718/- to M/s HDB Finance Services, a Non- Banking Finance Company. 3. On subsequent examination of the relevant assessment record, the Ld.PCIT observed that the assessment order was passed without making proper verification, hence, considered

SRI SRUJANA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTIONS,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

65,000/- per month. She is also the (M/s. Sri Srujana Educational Society) Secretary and Correspondent of the assessee- society. Accordingly, for the year under consideration the assessee had paid the sum of Rs. 19.80 lakhs and the same was claimed as deduction. The Ld.A.R. further submitted that the assessee has taken the vast area of 16000 sq.ft of building

ARABOLU VENKATA NAGA DEEPATHI REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, N. SATYARAMANUJAMM ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal fails and the same is hereby dismissed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.178/Viz/2018 (ननधधारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2010-11) Smt.Arabolu Venkata Naga Deepthi Vs. Income Tax Officer Rep. By Power Of Attorney Holder (International Taxation) Smt. N.Satyaramanujam Visakhapatnam Flat No.403, Dhanna Apartments Seethammadhara Visakhapatnam [Pan : Atcpa6413A] (अपीलाथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent)

TDS u/s 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’) on the payments made by him to the assessee. Subsequently, the assessee filed her income tax return for the A.Y.2010-11 on 17.05.2013 admitting sale consideration of Rs.39,69,000/-, towards her share on account of the above transfer of property and claimed exemption u/s 54F for the entire

SRI VARALAKSHMI JUTE TWINE MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED,,RAJAM vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-4(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bledcit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Ito, Ward-3, Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Srikakulam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Acit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Dcit, Circle-4(1), Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Visakhapatnam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L (Appellants) (Respondents)

TDS wherever applicable, in accordance with the provision of section 192 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (viii) Ex-gratia function 79,540 These expenses were expenses incurred for the lumpsum Ex-gratia distribution function held on 13-01-2012 ITA Nos. 458 & 404/VIZ/2017 (M/s. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd.) an the details of expenses under various heads

SRI VARALAKSHMI JUTE TWINE MILLS PVT. LTD.,,RAJAM vs. THE ITO,, SRIKAKULAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bledcit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Ito, Ward-3, Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Srikakulam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Acit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Dcit, Circle-4(1), Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Visakhapatnam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L (Appellants) (Respondents)

TDS wherever applicable, in accordance with the provision of section 192 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (viii) Ex-gratia function 79,540 These expenses were expenses incurred for the lumpsum Ex-gratia distribution function held on 13-01-2012 ITA Nos. 458 & 404/VIZ/2017 (M/s. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd.) an the details of expenses under various heads

THE DCIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI VARALAKSHMI JUTE MILLS PVT LTD,, SRIKAKULAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bledcit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Ito, Ward-3, Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Srikakulam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Acit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Dcit, Circle-4(1), Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Visakhapatnam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L (Appellants) (Respondents)

TDS wherever applicable, in accordance with the provision of section 192 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (viii) Ex-gratia function 79,540 These expenses were expenses incurred for the lumpsum Ex-gratia distribution function held on 13-01-2012 ITA Nos. 458 & 404/VIZ/2017 (M/s. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd.) an the details of expenses under various heads

ACIT, CIRCLE-4(1), , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI VARALAKSHMI JUTE TWINE MILLS PVT. LTD,, RAJAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bledcit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Ito, Ward-3, Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Srikakulam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Acit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Dcit, Circle-4(1), Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Visakhapatnam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L (Appellants) (Respondents)

TDS wherever applicable, in accordance with the provision of section 192 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (viii) Ex-gratia function 79,540 These expenses were expenses incurred for the lumpsum Ex-gratia distribution function held on 13-01-2012 ITA Nos. 458 & 404/VIZ/2017 (M/s. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd.) an the details of expenses under various heads

ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED,,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1),, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri N.K.Choudhry, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.168/Viz/2020 (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year:2015-16) Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Corporation Ltd. Income Tax Vijayawada Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aacca2734J] Vijayawada (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

65,521/- towards corporate social responsibility, which is also not an allowable deduction as per explanation 2 of section 37(1) of the Act. Accordingly, the Ld.Pr.CIT issued show cause notice to the assessee calling for explanation of the assessee as to why the assessment should not be revised u/s 263 of the act? In response to the show cause

THE DCIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. AKSHAYA GOLD FARMS & VILLAS INDIA LTD.,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

65,51,174/-. The Assessing Officer further noted that from the Form No. 3D report that the assessee to deduct tax on advertisement charges for Rs. 1,02,971/- and finance charges for Rs. 27,526/- and it is also seen from the TDS (M/s. Akshaya Gold Farms & Villas India Ltd.) ledger account that the TDS deducted

THE DCIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. AKSHAYA GOLD FARMS & VILLAS INDIA LTD.,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

65,51,174/-. The Assessing Officer further noted that from the Form No. 3D report that the assessee to deduct tax on advertisement charges for Rs. 1,02,971/- and finance charges for Rs. 27,526/- and it is also seen from the TDS (M/s. Akshaya Gold Farms & Villas India Ltd.) ledger account that the TDS deducted

THE ACIT,CIRCLE - 1,, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. M/S. SAMPAT KUMAR BANG,, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, the appeal filed by revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

section 40A(2)(b) of the Act but neither the CIT(A) nor the assessing officer has examined the genuineness of payments as well as the payments specified u/s 40A(2)(b) of the Act. The A.O. even in remand report has not examined the genuineness of payments and payments made in respect of specified persons

TUTTA ANNAPURNESWARI,NARSIPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, ANAKAPALLE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.42/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2014-15) Tutta Annapurneswari, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Narsipatnam Mandal, Ward-1, Anakapalli District. Anakapalle. Pan: Asbpt 6963 E (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधर्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Gvn Hari, Ar प्रत्यधर्थी की ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar

section 249(4) of the Act. 3. Without prejudice to the above, the Ld. CIT(A) ought to have directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 49,65,258/- made towards underreporting of salary income. 4. Any other grounds may be urged at the time of hearing.” 3. The only issue emanating from the grounds raised

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VIJAYAWADA vs. FYSOLATE TECHNOLOGIES, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.182/Viz/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18) Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. Fysolate Technologies, Income Tax, Vijayawada. Vijawayada. Pan: Aacff5633L (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Mithilesh Sannareddy ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Satyasai Rath, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 16/04/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of : 15/07/2024 Pronouncement O R D E R

65 Percentile 10.96% 12.31% The Ld. TPO has arrived at the Median of the PBDIT/OR at 8.93% and compared with the assessee’s PBDIT/OR which stood at 60.44%. The Ld. TPO also observed that the assessee is availing Tax Holiday benefit under section 10AA of the Act. Thereafter, the Ld. TPO issued a show cause notice dated 09/01/2021 requesting