RANAR AGROCHEM LIMITED,PARAWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.288/Viz/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2014-15) Ranar Agrochem Limited, Vs. Deputy Commissioner Visakhapatnam. Of Income Tax, Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaccp0372M (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri M. Madhusudan, Ca (Hybrid) राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Sri Jenardhanan V, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 14/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 31/10/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, J.M: The Present Appeal Filed By The Assessee Company Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Center (Nfac), Delhi, Dated 15/05/2024, Which In Turn Arises From The Order Passed By The Assessing Officer (For Short, “A.O.”) Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (For Short “The Act”) Dated 30/12/2016 For A.Y.

6 Ranar Agrochem Limited vs. DCIT CIRCULAR NO.22/2015 [F.NO.279/MISC/140/2015-ITJJ, DATED 17-12-2015 1. "As per section 43B of the Act certain deductions are admissible only on payment basis. It is observed by the Board that some field officers disallow employer's contributions to provident fund or superannuation fund or gratuity fund or any other fund for the welfare

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VIZAG SEAPORT PVT. LTD., VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon‟Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon‟Ble(Through Hybrid Hearing) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 383/Viz/2017 (धनधाारणिर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2012-13) The Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Vizag Seaport Pvt Ltd., Income Tax, Administrative Block, Circle-5(1), S4 Gallery, Port Area, Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam – 530035. (अपीलाथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent) [Pan :Aabcv2484K] अपीलाथी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Fenil A Bhatt, Ar प्रत्याथी की ओर से/ Revenue By : Dr. Satyasai Rath, Cit-Dr सुनिाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 15/02/2024 घोर्णा की तारीख/Date Of : /04/2024 Pronouncement O R D E R Pers. Balakrishnan:

TDS, disallowance under section 40a(ia) of the Act cannot be made and the correct course of action would have been to invoke Section 201 of the Act. On similar facts, the Calcutta High Court in CIT v. S.K. Tekriwal [2014] 46 taxmann.com 444/361 ITR 432/[2013] 260 CTR 73/2012 SCC Online CAL 12147 dismissed the Revenue's appeal

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA vs. ANDHRA PRADESH URBAN FINANCIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, cross objection filed by the assessee are disposed off accordingly

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.318, 327 & 328/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Acit – Circle – 1(1) V. Andhra Pradesh Urban Financial & Infrastructure Development Central Revenue Buildings Corporation M.G. Road, Vijayawada – 520002 54-15-5, Srinivasa Nagar Bank Colony Opp. Venue Convention Centre-520008 Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaifa9311J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

TDS return payment of Rs.63,99,271/- for the F.Y 2014-15. Since assessee has not filed return of income, Ld. AO, Ward 6(1) Hyderabad issued notice under section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA vs. ANDHRA PRADESH URBAN FINANCIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, cross objection filed by the assessee are disposed off accordingly

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.318, 327 & 328/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Acit – Circle – 1(1) V. Andhra Pradesh Urban Financial & Infrastructure Development Central Revenue Buildings Corporation M.G. Road, Vijayawada – 520002 54-15-5, Srinivasa Nagar Bank Colony Opp. Venue Convention Centre-520008 Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaifa9311J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

TDS return payment of Rs.63,99,271/- for the F.Y 2014-15. Since assessee has not filed return of income, Ld. AO, Ward 6(1) Hyderabad issued notice under section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA vs. ANDHRA PRADESH URBAN FINANCIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, cross objection filed by the assessee are disposed off accordingly

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.318, 327 & 328/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18) Acit – Circle – 1(1) V. Andhra Pradesh Urban Financial & Infrastructure Development Central Revenue Buildings Corporation M.G. Road, Vijayawada – 520002 54-15-5, Srinivasa Nagar Bank Colony Opp. Venue Convention Centre-520008 Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaifa9311J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

TDS return payment of Rs.63,99,271/- for the F.Y 2014-15. Since assessee has not filed return of income, Ld. AO, Ward 6(1) Hyderabad issued notice under section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. HINDUSTAN SHIPYARD LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. Nos.202, 198, 199, 188, 200/Viz/2022 (धनधाारणिर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2009-10, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Hindustan Shipyard Tax, Circle-3(1), Limited, Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aach 4275 P (अपीलाथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent)

section 194I of the Act. 6. For these and other grounds that may be urged at the time of appeal hearing, it is prayed that the disallowance / additions made by the AO be restored.” 30. The above grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue for the AY 2009-10 are identical to that of the grounds raised by the Revenue

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. HINDUSTAN SHIPYARD LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. Nos.202, 198, 199, 188, 200/Viz/2022 (धनधाारणिर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2009-10, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Hindustan Shipyard Tax, Circle-3(1), Limited, Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aach 4275 P (अपीलाथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent)

section 194I of the Act. 6. For these and other grounds that may be urged at the time of appeal hearing, it is prayed that the disallowance / additions made by the AO be restored.” 30. The above grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue for the AY 2009-10 are identical to that of the grounds raised by the Revenue

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. HINDUSTAN SHIPYARD LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. Nos.202, 198, 199, 188, 200/Viz/2022 (धनधाारणिर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2009-10, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Hindustan Shipyard Tax, Circle-3(1), Limited, Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aach 4275 P (अपीलाथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent)

section 194I of the Act. 6. For these and other grounds that may be urged at the time of appeal hearing, it is prayed that the disallowance / additions made by the AO be restored.” 30. The above grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue for the AY 2009-10 are identical to that of the grounds raised by the Revenue

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. HINDUSTAN SHIPYARD LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. Nos.202, 198, 199, 188, 200/Viz/2022 (धनधाारणिर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2009-10, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Hindustan Shipyard Tax, Circle-3(1), Limited, Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aach 4275 P (अपीलाथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent)

section 194I of the Act. 6. For these and other grounds that may be urged at the time of appeal hearing, it is prayed that the disallowance / additions made by the AO be restored.” 30. The above grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue for the AY 2009-10 are identical to that of the grounds raised by the Revenue

HINDUSTAN SHIPYARD LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ADDL.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-3, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. Nos.202, 198, 199, 188, 200/Viz/2022 (धनधाारणिर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2009-10, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Hindustan Shipyard Tax, Circle-3(1), Limited, Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aach 4275 P (अपीलाथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent)

section 194I of the Act. 6. For these and other grounds that may be urged at the time of appeal hearing, it is prayed that the disallowance / additions made by the AO be restored.” 30. The above grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue for the AY 2009-10 are identical to that of the grounds raised by the Revenue

KUSHALAVA SPINNERS & GINNERS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, GUNTUR

Bench: Us:

TDS Ward ('AO') u/s. 201(1A) of the IT Act dt. 28-10-2021, is not in accordance with the fact and provisions of law. 2. The Learned CIT(A) ought not have dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant, ex-parte, in view of the provisions of section 250(6

SRI SEETARAMANJANENYA SORTEX,KAKINADA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.147/Viz/2023 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2018-19) Sri Seetaramanjaneya Sortex Vs. Principal Commissioner Of 1-2015/A, Uppalanka Income Tax Kakinada Visakhapatnam [Pan : Abdfs4641P] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

section u/s 2(24)(x) r.w.s. 36(1)(va) and applicability of TDS provision on expenditures towards interest, commission, contract & professional charges and directed the AO to pass a suitable order giving reasonably opportunity of being heard to the assessee. 6

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS provisions, the late fee levied on account of default in furnishing the statements beyond the prescribed time limit is as per the provisions of the IT Act, 1961. The Ld. DR further submitted that 6 the fee charged U/s. 234E is not in lieu of penalty as the fee charged under section

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS provisions, the late fee levied on account of default in furnishing the statements beyond the prescribed time limit is as per the provisions of the IT Act, 1961. The Ld. DR further submitted that 6 the fee charged U/s. 234E is not in lieu of penalty as the fee charged under section

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS provisions, the late fee levied on account of default in furnishing the statements beyond the prescribed time limit is as per the provisions of the IT Act, 1961. The Ld. DR further submitted that 6 the fee charged U/s. 234E is not in lieu of penalty as the fee charged under section

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS provisions, the late fee levied on account of default in furnishing the statements beyond the prescribed time limit is as per the provisions of the IT Act, 1961. The Ld. DR further submitted that 6 the fee charged U/s. 234E is not in lieu of penalty as the fee charged under section

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS provisions, the late fee levied on account of default in furnishing the statements beyond the prescribed time limit is as per the provisions of the IT Act, 1961. The Ld. DR further submitted that 6 the fee charged U/s. 234E is not in lieu of penalty as the fee charged under section

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS provisions, the late fee levied on account of default in furnishing the statements beyond the prescribed time limit is as per the provisions of the IT Act, 1961. The Ld. DR further submitted that 6 the fee charged U/s. 234E is not in lieu of penalty as the fee charged under section