Search: TDS | BharatTax

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 50C(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai76 Delhi49 Bangalore13 Chennai11 Ahmedabad11 Guwahati9 Jaipur8 Chandigarh8 Kolkata8 Hyderabad5 Indore4 Lucknow4 Surat4 Agra3 Nagpur3 Pune3 Rajkot2 Jodhpur2 Jabalpur2 Visakhapatnam2 Amritsar2 Raipur1 Patna1 Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 2018 Section 201(1)6 Section 143(3)3 Section 36(1)(iii)2 Deduction2

ADABALA MANMOHAN,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 135/VIZ/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अऩीऱ सं./ I.T.A. No.135/Viz/2021 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year :2011-12) Mr. Adabala Manmohan, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Visakhapatnam. Ward-International Taxation, Pan: Vpnao 1959 G Visakhapatnam. (अऩीऱधथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent) अऩीऱधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri C. Subrahmanyam, Ca प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Sri Spg Mudaliar, Sr. Ar

For Appellant: Sri C. Subrahmanyam, CAFor Respondent: Sri SPG Mudaliar, Sr. AR

Section 2Section 201Section 201(1)Section 201(2)Section 234B

TDS. 4. Without prejudice to the above grounds, Ld. CIT(A) ought to have taken cognizance of the fact that when the said capital gains was assessed and tax demand was raised in the hands of the said NRI payee, under such circumstances, upholding the finding of the AO that the appellant is assessee in default

ADABALA MANMOHAN,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, VISAKHAPATNAM

ADABALA MANMOHAN,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, VISAKHAPATNAM

SRINIVASA HAIR INDUSTRIES,ELURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX., ELURU