BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

14 results for “TDS”+ Section 301clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi288Mumbai286Karnataka105Chennai78Bangalore73Chandigarh73Ahmedabad47Kolkata44Pune41Jaipur36Indore22Hyderabad20Kerala19Visakhapatnam14Lucknow10Rajkot10Surat9Cochin9Nagpur6Amritsar6Jodhpur4Cuttack2Raipur2Allahabad2Guwahati1Agra1SC1Telangana1Ranchi1Panaji1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 234E56Section 200A46Section 200A(1)(c)12TDS11Charitable Trust10Section 407Section 54F5Section 40A(2)4Disallowance3Addition to Income

THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR(AH) VETERINARY HOSPITAL,,JAGGAMPETA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, WARD-1,, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 519/VIZ/2018[2015-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam01 Feb 2018AY 2015-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Blethe Asst. Director (Ah) Vs. Ito (Tds), Ward-1, Veterinary Hospital, D.No. 7-63, Rajahmundry. Gokavaram Road, Jaggampeta, East Godavari District. Pan No. Vpnao 1812 G (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri C. Subrahmanyam– FCAFor Respondent: Shri D.V. Subba Rao – Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

301 CTR 150 (Kar.)] by considering the judgment of the same High Court in the case of Fatheraj Singhvi & Ors. (supra) and held that “when the amendment made under section 200A of the Act, which has come into effect on 01/06/2015 is held to be having prospective effect, no computation of fee for the demand or the intimation

3
Section 40a2
Section 2632

PAVANI DEVI,,GUNTUR vs. THE CIT(A)-2,, GUNTUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 312/VIZ/2016[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam01 Feb 2018AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Blesmt. Pavani Devi, Vs. Acit, Cpc (Tds), M/S. N. Koteswara & Co., Cas, Ghaziabad. D.No. 23-6-17/2, Patnam Bazar, Guntur. Pan No. Afmpd 2253 F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri G.V.N. Hari – Advocate. Department By : Mrs. Suman Malik – Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 20/12/2018. Date Of Pronouncement : 01/01/2019. O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari – AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs. Suman Malik – Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

section 200A(1)(c) is a clarificatory in nature, therefore, it applies even the period prior to 01/06/2015. The coordinate bench of the Visakhapatnam tribunal in the case of Sri Sai Durga Housing Estates Vs. ACIT, CPC (TDS) in ITA Nos. 2 & 3/VIZ/2018, dated 26/04/2018 wherein by considering the judgments of the Hon'ble Gujarat & Karnataka High Courts and also

AVNC HIGH SCHOOL, ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL, TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 459/VIZ/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam01 Feb 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari – AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs. Suman Malik – Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

section 200A(1)(c) is a clarificatory in nature, therefore, it applies even the period prior to 01/06/2015 by following the decision of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Rajesh Kourani (supra). The coordinate bench of the Visakhapatnam tribunal in the case of Sri Sai Durga Housing Estates Vs. ACIT, CPC (TDS) in (Mrs. A.V.N.C. High

AVNC HIGH SCHOOL,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL, TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 460/VIZ/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam01 Feb 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari – AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs. Suman Malik – Sr.DR
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

section 200A(1)(c) is a clarificatory in nature, therefore, it applies even the period prior to 01/06/2015 by following the decision of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Rajesh Kourani (supra). The coordinate bench of the Visakhapatnam tribunal in the case of Sri Sai Durga Housing Estates Vs. ACIT, CPC (TDS) in (Mrs. A.V.N.C. High

VIKAS EDUCATRIONAL SOCIETY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ITO, WARD - 3(2),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 385/VIZ/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Oct 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.385/Viz/2014 & I.T.A.No.386/Viz/2014 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2009-10 & 2010-11) M/S Vikas Educational Society Vs. The Income Tax Officer D.No.8-1-97/1/8, Ninitaas High Ward-3(2) Pedawaltair Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aaatv 3260F] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri Kjd Srinivas, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 05.09.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30.10.2019

For Appellant: Shri KJD Srinivas, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 40Section 40A(2)Section 40a

section 194I of Income Tax Act and the assessee failed to remit the same to the Government account, the AO issued show cause notice to the assessee, as to why the expenditure claimed should not be disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia) of the 6 I.T.A. No.385/Viz/2014 and 386/Viz/2014, A.Y.2009-10 & 2010-11 M/s Vikas Educational Society, Visakhapatnam Act for non deduction

VIKAS EDUCATRIONAL SOCIETY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ITO, WARD - 3(2),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 386/VIZ/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Oct 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.385/Viz/2014 & I.T.A.No.386/Viz/2014 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2009-10 & 2010-11) M/S Vikas Educational Society Vs. The Income Tax Officer D.No.8-1-97/1/8, Ninitaas High Ward-3(2) Pedawaltair Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aaatv 3260F] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri Kjd Srinivas, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 05.09.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30.10.2019

For Appellant: Shri KJD Srinivas, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 40Section 40A(2)Section 40a

section 194I of Income Tax Act and the assessee failed to remit the same to the Government account, the AO issued show cause notice to the assessee, as to why the expenditure claimed should not be disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia) of the 6 I.T.A. No.385/Viz/2014 and 386/Viz/2014, A.Y.2009-10 & 2010-11 M/s Vikas Educational Society, Visakhapatnam Act for non deduction

MANORAMA ENTERPRISES,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS, WARD-1, , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 385/VIZ/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam03 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.385/Viz/2018 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2013-14) M/S Manorama Enterprises Vs. Income Tax Officer D.No.31-32-41 Tds, Ward-1 Near Leelamahal Theatre Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aadfm5585H] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri R.L.N.Somayajulu, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri D.V.Subba Rao, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 21.06.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 03.07.2019 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri R.L.N.Somayajulu, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.V.Subba Rao, DR
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 201Section 234E

section 200A(1)(c) is a clarificatory in nature, therefore, it applies even the period prior to 01/06/2015 by following the decision of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Rajesh Kourani (supra). The coordinate bench of the Visakhapatnam tribunal in the case of Sri Sai Durga Housing Estates Vs. ACIT, CPC (TDS

G M CONSTRUCTIONS,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. CIT, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 508/VIZ/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam03 Jul 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.508/Viz/2017 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2012-13) M/S G.M.Constructions Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax C/O Sunil Kumar Gautam Visakhapatnam 18-36-1, Kothasalipeta Maharanipeta Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aakfg5978M] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 13.06.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 03.07.2019 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 195Section 263Section 40

section 40(a)(ia) for cash component, but has not applied his mind with regard to the payment made by transfer of built up area. Non examination of the issue is an error on the part of the AO and since the taxable income has not brought to tax, the same is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue, therefore

COMMANDANT ,MANGALAGIRI vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A)-2, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 579/VIZ/2019[2015-16 and F.Y. 2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam31 May 2021

Bench: Shri N.K.Choudhry, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.578/Viz/2019 To 582/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2014-15 & 2015-16 ) Commandant, 6Th Bn Apsp Income Tax Officer (Tds) Camp, Mangalagiri Guntur Guntur [Pan : Aaagc1899L] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N. Hari, Advocate. रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt.Suman Malik, Dr

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.Suman Malik, DR
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

TDS deducted for the respective assessment year prior to 01.06.2015. The Ld.AR further submitted that when there are divergent decisions of Hon’ble High Courts, the decision most favourable to the assessee has to be adopted as held by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs Vegetable Products Ltd. (88 ITR 192)and hence requested to allow

COMMANDANT,MANGALAGIRI vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A)-2, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 578/VIZ/2019[2015-16 and F.Y. 2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam31 May 2021

Bench: Shri N.K.Choudhry, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.578/Viz/2019 To 582/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2014-15 & 2015-16 ) Commandant, 6Th Bn Apsp Income Tax Officer (Tds) Camp, Mangalagiri Guntur Guntur [Pan : Aaagc1899L] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N. Hari, Advocate. रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt.Suman Malik, Dr

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.Suman Malik, DR
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

TDS deducted for the respective assessment year prior to 01.06.2015. The Ld.AR further submitted that when there are divergent decisions of Hon’ble High Courts, the decision most favourable to the assessee has to be adopted as held by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs Vegetable Products Ltd. (88 ITR 192)and hence requested to allow

COMMANDANT,MANGALAGIRI vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-2, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 580/VIZ/2019[2015-16 and F.Y. 2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam31 May 2021

Bench: Shri N.K.Choudhry, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.578/Viz/2019 To 582/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2014-15 & 2015-16 ) Commandant, 6Th Bn Apsp Income Tax Officer (Tds) Camp, Mangalagiri Guntur Guntur [Pan : Aaagc1899L] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N. Hari, Advocate. रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt.Suman Malik, Dr

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.Suman Malik, DR
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

TDS deducted for the respective assessment year prior to 01.06.2015. The Ld.AR further submitted that when there are divergent decisions of Hon’ble High Courts, the decision most favourable to the assessee has to be adopted as held by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs Vegetable Products Ltd. (88 ITR 192)and hence requested to allow

COMMANDANT ,MANGALAGIRI vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-2, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 581/VIZ/2019[2014-15 and F.Y. 2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam31 May 2021

Bench: Shri N.K.Choudhry, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.578/Viz/2019 To 582/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2014-15 & 2015-16 ) Commandant, 6Th Bn Apsp Income Tax Officer (Tds) Camp, Mangalagiri Guntur Guntur [Pan : Aaagc1899L] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N. Hari, Advocate. रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt.Suman Malik, Dr

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.Suman Malik, DR
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

TDS deducted for the respective assessment year prior to 01.06.2015. The Ld.AR further submitted that when there are divergent decisions of Hon’ble High Courts, the decision most favourable to the assessee has to be adopted as held by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs Vegetable Products Ltd. (88 ITR 192)and hence requested to allow

COMMANDANT,MANGALAGIRI vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-2, GUNTUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 582/VIZ/2019[2015-16 and F.Y. 2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam31 May 2021

Bench: Shri N.K.Choudhry, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.578/Viz/2019 To 582/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2014-15 & 2015-16 ) Commandant, 6Th Bn Apsp Income Tax Officer (Tds) Camp, Mangalagiri Guntur Guntur [Pan : Aaagc1899L] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N. Hari, Advocate. रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt.Suman Malik, Dr

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.Suman Malik, DR
Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

TDS deducted for the respective assessment year prior to 01.06.2015. The Ld.AR further submitted that when there are divergent decisions of Hon’ble High Courts, the decision most favourable to the assessee has to be adopted as held by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs Vegetable Products Ltd. (88 ITR 192)and hence requested to allow

ARABOLU VENKATA NAGA DEEPATHI REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, N. SATYARAMANUJAMM ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal fails and the same is hereby dismissed

ITA 178/VIZ/2018[2010-2011]Status: HeardITAT Visakhapatnam28 Mar 2022AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.178/Viz/2018 (ननधधारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2010-11) Smt.Arabolu Venkata Naga Deepthi Vs. Income Tax Officer Rep. By Power Of Attorney Holder (International Taxation) Smt. N.Satyaramanujam Visakhapatnam Flat No.403, Dhanna Apartments Seethammadhara Visakhapatnam [Pan : Atcpa6413A] (अपीलाथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri I.Kama Sastry, ARFor Respondent: Shri SPG Mudaliar, DR
Section 143(2)Section 148Section 195Section 201(1)Section 234ASection 54Section 54F

TDS u/s 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’) on the payments made by him to the assessee. Subsequently, the assessee filed her income tax return for the A.Y.2010-11 on 17.05.2013 admitting sale consideration of Rs.39,69,000/-, towards her share on account of the above transfer of property and claimed exemption u/s 54F for the entire