CHALUVADI ANJANEYULU (HUF),,MACHILIPATNAM vs. THE CIT,, VIJAYAWADA
In the result appeals of the assessee are allowed
ITA 270/VIZ/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam31 May 2019AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.248/Viz/2014 (ननधधारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2009-2010) Chaluvadi Anjaneyulu (Huf) Vs. Commissioner Of Prop.: Sree Seetharamanjaneya Income Tax Rice Traders, 6-156, Fort Road Vijayawada Machilipatnam [Pan : Aaahc6340R] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No. 270/Viz/2015 (ननधधारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2009-2010) Chaluvadi Anjaneyulu (Huf) Income Tax Officer Prop.: Sree Seetharamanjaneya Ward-1 Rice Traders, 6-156, Fort Road Machilipatnam Machilipatnam [Pan : Aaahc6340R] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri Siva Ram Kumar, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से/ Respondent By : Shri Ch Sanjeev, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 08.01.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11.01.2019
For Appellant: Shri Siva Ram Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ch Sanjeev, DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40Section 44A
288/- to Shri Ch.Dileep. No TDS was deducted and the same has to be brought to tax u/s 40(a)(ia).
iii)
The assessee has claimed chit loss as revenue expenditure which required to be disallowed.
2.1
The Ld.CIT issued show cause notice to the assessee calling for the explanation as to why the assessment should not be revised