Search: TDS | BharatTax

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 206C(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 234E16 Section 200A10 Section 206C9 TDS5 Section 133A3 Section 206C(6)3 Survey u/s 133A3 Section 200(3)2

SRI SAI DURGA HOUSING ESTATES,VIJAYAWADA vs. ACIT, CENTRALISED PROCESSING CELL-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2/VIZ/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Apr 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri C. Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Shri V. Appala Raju, DR

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

TDS returns which were deemed to be filed by the assessee were filed after delay and the question was whether the Assessing Officer while processing the intimation under section 200A could charge late fee under the provisions of section 234E. The assessee claims that the Assessing Officer at best could charge the difference in tax deducted and not paid

SRI SAI DURGA HOUSING ESTATES,VIJAYAWADA vs. ACIT, CENTRALISED PROCESSING CELL-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

SRI SAI DURGA HOUSING ESTATES,VIJAYAWADA vs. ACIT, CENTRALISED PROCESSING CELL-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

SRI SAI DURGA HOUSING ESTATES,VIJAYAWADA vs. ACIT, CENTRALISED PROCESSING CELL-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

SRI SAI DURGA HOUSING ESTATES,VIJAYAWADA vs. ACIT, CENTRALISED PROCESSING CELL-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

VISWATEJA SPINNING MILLS PVT LTD,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), WARD-1, GUNTUR

VISWATEJA SPINNING MILLS PVT LTD,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), WARD-1, GUNTUR

VISWATEJA SPINNING MILLS PVT LTD,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), WARD-1, GUNTUR