Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 194Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai337 Delhi302 Bangalore106 Kolkata105 Chennai79 Jaipur40 Indore39 Ahmedabad39 Hyderabad38 Karnataka27 Cuttack25 Pune22 Rajkot21 Chandigarh20 Amritsar10 Cochin9 Surat7 Patna7 Raipur6 Visakhapatnam6 Lucknow5 Telangana4 Jabalpur3 SC3 Calcutta3 Guwahati3 Allahabad3 Nagpur3 Jodhpur2 Kerala2 Ranchi2 Panaji1 Agra1

Key Topics

Section 194H10 Section 271C8 Section 143(3)7 Section 201(1)6 Section 1955 Section 405 Section 1545 TDS5 Section 2634 Deduction

M/S. FUSION VOICE SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT.LTD,,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE ITO,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 335/VIZ/2017[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Mar 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal

Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 263Section 40

section 194H is bad under law. Thus, it is clear that the liability to deduct TDS under section 194H of the Act arises

EISWAR EAXPORTS,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-6,, VISAKHAPATNAM

4

Revision u/s 2632

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 462/VIZ/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam07 Aug 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Blem/S. Eswar Exports, Vs. Addl. Cit, Range-6, D.No. 23-14-13, Chinnamvari Visakhapatnam. Street, Visakhapatnam. Tan No. Vpne00441A (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Samuel Nagadesi – CAFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Sonawal – Sr.DR

Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 271C

194H during (M/s. Eswar Exports) the F.Y. 2012-13, but not remitted the same into the Government account within the stipulated due date, the quantum of such non-remitted TDS was found to be Rs. 6,99,878/-. Hence, the Addl.CIT(TDS) issued a show-cause notice to the assessee- deductor for levy of penalty u/sec. 271C. In response

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI NARASIMHARAJU KANUMURI, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue in ITA No

ITA 267/VIZ/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam13 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.267/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18) Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. Sri Narasimharaju Income Tax, Kanumuri, Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aerpk2717F (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sri GVN Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS provisions under Section 194H, if any, would be relevant for the payments to the resident intermediaries and no obligation

ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED,KANURU vs. ITO, TDS, WARD(1), ELURU, ELURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 29/VIZ/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam03 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.29/Viz/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year:2019-20) Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Civil The Income Tax Officer (Tds)-Ward-1 Eluru – 534001 Supplies Corporation Limited Andhra Pradesh 10-152/1, 4Th Floor Sai Towers, Ashok Nagar Bandar Road, Kanuru – 520007 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aabca7161R]

Section 154Section 201(1)Section 249(2)Section 249(3)

TDS u/s 194H is void-ab-intio.” 5. The only issue contested by the assessee is with respect to the cause that Ld. CIT(A) has not condoned the delay in filing the appeal with a delay of 1049 days. On this issue, Ld. Authorised Representative [hereinafter “Ld.AR”] submitted that the assessee received the order under section

NADIMPALLY VENKATA SANKAR RAMA KRISHNAM RAJU,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ITO,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 322/VIZ/2017[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam04 Apr 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 194HSection 263Section 40

section 263 of the Act. The Ld. A.R. of the assessee contended before the Pr. CIT that the assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of the Act after considering the above issue N. Venkata Sankar Rama Krishnam Raju, VSKP and the A.O. has taken conscious view that payment do not attract TDS u/s 194H

TEKI VENKATA RAMA RAO,,KAKINADA vs. THE ITO,, KAKINADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 151/VIZ/2017[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam10 Aug 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.151/Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year:2012-13) Sri Teki Venkata Ramana Rao Vs. Income Tax Officer D.No.11-2-10 (International Taxation) Seshasai Street Kakinada Ramarao Peta Kakinada, E.G.Dist [Pan :Affpt6413G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri I.Kama Sastry, Ar प्रत्यार्थी की ओर से/ Respondent By : Shri V.Appala Raju, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 25.07.2018 10.08.2018 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement :

For Appellant: Shri I.Kama Sastry, ARFor Respondent: Shri V.Appala Raju, DR

Section 195Section 201Section 201(1)Section 201(2)

TDS) 209 Taxmann 0092. 7. On the other hand, the Ld.DR supported the orders of the Ld.CIT(A). 8. We have heard both the parties and perused the material placed on record. In this case, the assessee made the payments to the non residents 6 Sri Teki Venkata Ramana Rao, Kakinada but not deducted the tax at source as required