SRI LAKSHMI GENERAL STORES,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

Bench: SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, HON’BLE (Accountant Member), SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

Sections 194Q and 194A. The Ld. CIT(A), without appreciating relevant facts, simply sustained additions made by the A.O. 9. We further noted that, this issue is squarely covered by the decision of ITAT, Visakhapatnam Bench, in the case of Bala Krishna Traders Vs. ITO (supra) where, under identical set of facts, the Tribunal has allowed credit for TDS

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE KANAKAMAHALAKSHMI COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue and the cross objections filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.68/Viz/2021 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2014-15) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Kanakamahalakshmi Co- Income Tax Operative Bank Ltd., Circle-1(1) D.No.49-34-22, Main Road, Visakhapatnam Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aacft 6489 J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co No.59/Viz/2021 (Arising Out Of Ita No.68/Viz/2021) (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2014-15) M/S. Kanakamahalakshmi Co- Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Operative Bank Ltd., Income Tax D.No.49-34-22, Main Road, Circle-1(1) Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aacft 6489 J] अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 28.02.2022 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16.03.2022 O R D E R

13 are general in nature which does not require any, therefore the same are dismissed. 3. Ground Nos. 2 to 4 relate to interest on share capital paid to the members of the bank. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer has noted that assessee had debited an amount of Rs.94,00,000/- for Assessment Year

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VIZAG SEAPORT PVT. LTD., VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon‟Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon‟Ble(Through Hybrid Hearing) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 383/Viz/2017 (धनधाारणिर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2012-13) The Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Vizag Seaport Pvt Ltd., Income Tax, Administrative Block, Circle-5(1), S4 Gallery, Port Area, Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam – 530035. (अपीलाथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent) [Pan :Aabcv2484K] अपीलाथी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Fenil A Bhatt, Ar प्रत्याथी की ओर से/ Revenue By : Dr. Satyasai Rath, Cit-Dr सुनिाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 15/02/2024 घोर्णा की तारीख/Date Of : /04/2024 Pronouncement O R D E R Pers. Balakrishnan:

TDS, no disallowance U/s. 40(a)(ia) of the Act can be made and the correct course of action would be to invoke the provisions of section 201 of the Act. We therefore dismiss this ground raised by the Revenue. 12. Additionally, with respect to the filing of application under Rule 27 of the ITAT Rules

MARIAPPAN AUSTIN PRAKASH,BENGALURU, KANRNATAKA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTL TXN CIRCLE, VISAKHAPATNAM

TDS amount of Rs.86,26,842/-. Thereafter, a\nquestionnaire under section 142(1) of the Act was issued and served on the\nassessee to provide the period of stay in India and the assessee in response\nsubmitted that he has stayed in India less than sixty (60) days during the\nimpugned assessment year and further submitted the Tax Residency Certificate

NANNEBOYINA KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (WARD IT), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.104/Viz/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2016-17) Nanneboyina Kalyan Chakravarthy V. Income Tax Officer C/O. C.R. Hemanthkumar Ward International Taxation Cr Building, 1St Floor Annex. H.No 9-14-4/7, Flat No. 7 M.G. Road, Vijayawada Sowbhagyaapartments Andhra Pradesh – 520002 Cbm Compound, Vip Road Andhra Pradesh - 530003 [Pan: Cuepk3530P] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

section 147 r.w.s 144C(13) of Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter in I.T.A.No.104/VIZ/2025 Nanneboyina Kalyan Chakravarthy short “the Act”] vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/AST/S/147/2024- 25/1071217684(1) dated 03.12.2024 for the A.Y. 2016-17. 2. The facts of the case are, assessee is an NRI and as per the Risk Management Strategy formulated by the CBDT through insight portal

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble(Hybrid Hearing) आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.507/Viz/2024 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22) 3F Industries Limited, Vs. Acit, P.B. No. 15, Tanuku Road, Circle-1, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari Rajamahendravaram. District, Andhra Pradesh-534102. Pan: Aaacf 2643 K (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Suvibha Nolkha, Ca ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar

section 250 of the Act dated 05th December, 2024, the Ld. Addl. / JCIT(A)-2 erred in (1) Failed to allow credit of unclaimed brought forward TDS of Rs. 13

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS statement beyond the stipulated time is in accordance with law. As well, the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in confirming the order of the Ld. AO cannot find fault with. Therefore, I have no hesitation to come to a 13 conclusion that the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities invoking the provisions of section

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS statement beyond the stipulated time is in accordance with law. As well, the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in confirming the order of the Ld. AO cannot find fault with. Therefore, I have no hesitation to come to a 13 conclusion that the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities invoking the provisions of section

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS statement beyond the stipulated time is in accordance with law. As well, the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in confirming the order of the Ld. AO cannot find fault with. Therefore, I have no hesitation to come to a 13 conclusion that the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities invoking the provisions of section

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS statement beyond the stipulated time is in accordance with law. As well, the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in confirming the order of the Ld. AO cannot find fault with. Therefore, I have no hesitation to come to a 13 conclusion that the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities invoking the provisions of section

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS statement beyond the stipulated time is in accordance with law. As well, the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in confirming the order of the Ld. AO cannot find fault with. Therefore, I have no hesitation to come to a 13 conclusion that the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities invoking the provisions of section

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS statement beyond the stipulated time is in accordance with law. As well, the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in confirming the order of the Ld. AO cannot find fault with. Therefore, I have no hesitation to come to a 13 conclusion that the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities invoking the provisions of section

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS statement beyond the stipulated time is in accordance with law. As well, the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in confirming the order of the Ld. AO cannot find fault with. Therefore, I have no hesitation to come to a 13 conclusion that the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities invoking the provisions of section

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS statement beyond the stipulated time is in accordance with law. As well, the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in confirming the order of the Ld. AO cannot find fault with. Therefore, I have no hesitation to come to a 13 conclusion that the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities invoking the provisions of section

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS statement beyond the stipulated time is in accordance with law. As well, the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in confirming the order of the Ld. AO cannot find fault with. Therefore, I have no hesitation to come to a 13 conclusion that the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities invoking the provisions of section

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS statement beyond the stipulated time is in accordance with law. As well, the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in confirming the order of the Ld. AO cannot find fault with. Therefore, I have no hesitation to come to a 13 conclusion that the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities invoking the provisions of section

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS statement beyond the stipulated time is in accordance with law. As well, the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in confirming the order of the Ld. AO cannot find fault with. Therefore, I have no hesitation to come to a 13 conclusion that the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities invoking the provisions of section

S V V S S D S S SCHOOL,ANNAVARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, eight appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.74 To 89/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2017-18) Svvssdss School, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Annavaram. Tds, Ward-1, Pan: Afipa 2580 C Rajahmundry. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 03/04/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

TDS statement beyond the stipulated time is in accordance with law. As well, the decision of the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in confirming the order of the Ld. AO cannot find fault with. Therefore, I have no hesitation to come to a 13 conclusion that the orders of the Ld. Revenue Authorities invoking the provisions of section