BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 2(22)(e)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,437Delhi1,137Chennai308Bangalore290Hyderabad218Ahmedabad195Jaipur152Kolkata140Indore118Chandigarh106Cochin84Pune68Rajkot65Surat58Visakhapatnam42Nagpur39Raipur28Cuttack28Lucknow27Guwahati24Agra22Amritsar19Jodhpur18Dehradun14Varanasi6Panaji5Jabalpur5Allahabad3Ranchi3

Key Topics

Section 143(3)11Survey u/s 133A6Section 2635Capital Gains5Long Term Capital Gains5Penny Stock5Revision u/s 2635

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 01,, VARANASI vs. M/S RATANDEEP GOLD & DIAMOND PVT. LTD., CHANDAULI

ITA 136/VNS/2020[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi03 Feb 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner M/S Ratandeep Gold & Diamond Of Income Tax, V. Pvt. Ltd. Circle-1, M A Road, 19, New Mohal, Varanasi-211001, U.P. Near Balika Inter College, Mugalsarai, Chandauli- 232101, U.P. Pan:Aahcr4764Q (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 02/Vns/2021 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 136/Vns/2020) Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/S Ratandeep Gold & The Deputy Commissioner Of Diamond Pvt. Ltd. V. Income Tax,Circle-1, M.A. Road 19, New Mohal, Varanasi-211001, U.P. Near Balika Inter College, Mugalsarai, Chandauli- 232101, U.P.

For Appellant: Shri Shishir Bajpai, CAFor Respondent: Shri Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 69A

price of unregistered purchase is already less than other purchases there remains no scope for suppression of profit in this respect. I have gone through the facts and circumstances of the case. Appellant submitted the reconciliation of the value of the stock found during the survey with the value of actual stock as per audited statement and no adverse inference

ANJU JHUNJHUNWALA,VARANASI vs. PCIT, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 198/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): In these bunch of appeals of different appellants for assessment years 2014-15 & 2015-16, the appellants have challenged separate impugned orders passed by ld. PCIT, Varanasi in his revisionary jurisdiction u/s. 263, cancelling the assessment orders passed u/s 143(3), holding to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue

SARVESH KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 252/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): In these bunch of appeals of different appellants for assessment years 2014-15 & 2015-16, the appellants have challenged separate impugned orders passed by ld. PCIT, Varanasi in his revisionary jurisdiction u/s. 263, cancelling the assessment orders passed u/s 143(3), holding to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue

VISHAL KANODIA,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 85/VNS/2019[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2014-2015
Section 143(3)Section 263

E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): In these bunch of appeals of different appellants for assessment years 2014-15 & 2015-16, the appellants have challenged separate impugned orders passed by ld. PCIT, Varanasi in his revisionary jurisdiction u/s. 263, cancelling the assessment orders passed u/s 143(3), holding to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue

GOPI KRISHNA VINOD KUMAR HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 111/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): In these bunch of appeals of different appellants for assessment years 2014-15 & 2015-16, the appellants have challenged separate impugned orders passed by ld. PCIT, Varanasi in his revisionary jurisdiction u/s. 263, cancelling the assessment orders passed u/s 143(3), holding to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue

VINOD KUMAR SARAF HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 112/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): In these bunch of appeals of different appellants for assessment years 2014-15 & 2015-16, the appellants have challenged separate impugned orders passed by ld. PCIT, Varanasi in his revisionary jurisdiction u/s. 263, cancelling the assessment orders passed u/s 143(3), holding to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue