M/S. VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , VARANASI

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 60 to 63 of the 1961 Act deals with revocable transfer of assets, and for creation of valid trust, transfer of the assets for charitable purposes should be irrevocable, which as per AO is not fulfilled in the case of the assessee. The AO observed that the assessee is neither in the field of education , nor in the field

VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASEE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 60 to 63 of the 1961 Act deals with revocable transfer of assets, and for creation of valid trust, transfer of the assets for charitable purposes should be irrevocable, which as per AO is not fulfilled in the case of the assessee. The AO observed that the assessee is neither in the field of education , nor in the field

VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASEE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 60 to 63 of the 1961 Act deals with revocable transfer of assets, and for creation of valid trust, transfer of the assets for charitable purposes should be irrevocable, which as per AO is not fulfilled in the case of the assessee. The AO observed that the assessee is neither in the field of education , nor in the field

M/S. VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), VARANASI

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 60 to 63 of the 1961 Act deals with revocable transfer of assets, and for creation of valid trust, transfer of the assets for charitable purposes should be irrevocable, which as per AO is not fulfilled in the case of the assessee. The AO observed that the assessee is neither in the field of education , nor in the field

MANISH JAISWAL,GORAKHPUR vs. ADDL. CIT, (TDS), ALLAHABAD

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2016-17 Mr. Manish Jaiswal, Addl.Cit (Tds), Prop. New Manish Medical V. Allahabad-211001, U.P. Agencies Pashupati Market, Gandhi Park, Gorakhpur, U.P. Pan: Akdpj7675D (Appellant) (Respondent)

transfer of immovable property(other than agricultural land). Show cause notice (SCN) dated 20.03.2019 was issued by the AO u/s 271C read with Section 274 of the 1961 Act, through email and also by Registered post, show-causing assessee as to why penalty u/s 271C be not levied for aforesaid failure. The assessee did not responded to aforesaid SCN , which

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 01,, VARANASI vs. M/S RATANDEEP GOLD & DIAMOND PVT. LTD., CHANDAULI

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner M/S Ratandeep Gold & Diamond Of Income Tax, V. Pvt. Ltd. Circle-1, M A Road, 19, New Mohal, Varanasi-211001, U.P. Near Balika Inter College, Mugalsarai, Chandauli- 232101, U.P. Pan:Aahcr4764Q (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 02/Vns/2021 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 136/Vns/2020) Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/S Ratandeep Gold & The Deputy Commissioner Of Diamond Pvt. Ltd. V. Income Tax,Circle-1, M.A. Road 19, New Mohal, Varanasi-211001, U.P. Near Balika Inter College, Mugalsarai, Chandauli- 232101, U.P.

price of unregistered purchase is already less than other purchases there remains no scope for suppression of profit in this respect. I have gone through the facts and circumstances of the case. Appellant submitted the reconciliation of the value of the stock found during the survey with the value of actual stock as per audited statement and no adverse inference

ANJU JHUNJHUNWALA,VARANASI vs. PCIT, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

1/-to Rs. 19.95/- 30.50/- within a short period of time? (iii) Whether you have utilized the such types of brokers who were engaged in manipulating & rigging the prices of shares in order to provide benefit to shareholders ? (iv) As the same phenomenon reflecting in your case, please show cause as to why the exemption claimed under section

VINOD KUMAR SARAF HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

1/-to Rs. 19.95/- 30.50/- within a short period of time? (iii) Whether you have utilized the such types of brokers who were engaged in manipulating & rigging the prices of shares in order to provide benefit to shareholders ? (iv) As the same phenomenon reflecting in your case, please show cause as to why the exemption claimed under section

GOPI KRISHNA VINOD KUMAR HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

1/-to Rs. 19.95/- 30.50/- within a short period of time? (iii) Whether you have utilized the such types of brokers who were engaged in manipulating & rigging the prices of shares in order to provide benefit to shareholders ? (iv) As the same phenomenon reflecting in your case, please show cause as to why the exemption claimed under section

VISHAL KANODIA,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

1/-to Rs. 19.95/- 30.50/- within a short period of time? (iii) Whether you have utilized the such types of brokers who were engaged in manipulating & rigging the prices of shares in order to provide benefit to shareholders ? (iv) As the same phenomenon reflecting in your case, please show cause as to why the exemption claimed under section

SARVESH KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

1/-to Rs. 19.95/- 30.50/- within a short period of time? (iii) Whether you have utilized the such types of brokers who were engaged in manipulating & rigging the prices of shares in order to provide benefit to shareholders ? (iv) As the same phenomenon reflecting in your case, please show cause as to why the exemption claimed under section

INDRA NARAYAN TRIPATHI,GORAKHPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE - 02,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

1) of Section 50- C exceeds the fair market value of the property on the date of transfer, the AO has to apply his mind on the validity of the objection of the assessee. He may either accept the valuation of the property on the basis of the report of the approved valuer filed by the assessee, or invite objection