DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 01,, VARANASI vs. M/S RATANDEEP GOLD & DIAMOND PVT. LTD., CHANDAULI

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner M/S Ratandeep Gold & Diamond Of Income Tax, V. Pvt. Ltd. Circle-1, M A Road, 19, New Mohal, Varanasi-211001, U.P. Near Balika Inter College, Mugalsarai, Chandauli- 232101, U.P. Pan:Aahcr4764Q (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 02/Vns/2021 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 136/Vns/2020) Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/S Ratandeep Gold & The Deputy Commissioner Of Diamond Pvt. Ltd. V. Income Tax,Circle-1, M.A. Road 19, New Mohal, Varanasi-211001, U.P. Near Balika Inter College, Mugalsarai, Chandauli- 232101, U.P.

price of unregistered purchase is already less than other purchases there remains no scope for suppression of profit in this respect. I have gone through the facts and circumstances of the case. Appellant submitted the reconciliation of the value of the stock found during the survey with the value of actual stock as per audited statement and no adverse inference

M/S. VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , VARANASI

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

price of their properties, it would be a better example of Mahajans charging compound interest at high interest rates on the amounts lent out, from the poor people of the society. From the above analysis of Hon’ble ITAT order referred to above, it becomes clear that decision of Allahabad High Court in the case of Lucknow development Authority relied

M/S. VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), VARANASI

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

price of their properties, it would be a better example of Mahajans charging compound interest at high interest rates on the amounts lent out, from the poor people of the society. From the above analysis of Hon’ble ITAT order referred to above, it becomes clear that decision of Allahabad High Court in the case of Lucknow development Authority relied

VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASEE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

price of their properties, it would be a better example of Mahajans charging compound interest at high interest rates on the amounts lent out, from the poor people of the society. From the above analysis of Hon’ble ITAT order referred to above, it becomes clear that decision of Allahabad High Court in the case of Lucknow development Authority relied

VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASEE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

price of their properties, it would be a better example of Mahajans charging compound interest at high interest rates on the amounts lent out, from the poor people of the society. From the above analysis of Hon’ble ITAT order referred to above, it becomes clear that decision of Allahabad High Court in the case of Lucknow development Authority relied

ANJU JHUNJHUNWALA,VARANASI vs. PCIT, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

income-tax payable under section 115]B" From, a bare reading of the said section and Literal construction of the same about which there is not ambiguity, it is evident that the only requirement to be complied with by an assessee for claiming exemption under section 10(38) is that the consideration should be realized on transfer of long term

SARVESH KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

income-tax payable under section 115]B" From, a bare reading of the said section and Literal construction of the same about which there is not ambiguity, it is evident that the only requirement to be complied with by an assessee for claiming exemption under section 10(38) is that the consideration should be realized on transfer of long term

VISHAL KANODIA,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

income-tax payable under section 115]B" From, a bare reading of the said section and Literal construction of the same about which there is not ambiguity, it is evident that the only requirement to be complied with by an assessee for claiming exemption under section 10(38) is that the consideration should be realized on transfer of long term

GOPI KRISHNA VINOD KUMAR HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

income-tax payable under section 115]B" From, a bare reading of the said section and Literal construction of the same about which there is not ambiguity, it is evident that the only requirement to be complied with by an assessee for claiming exemption under section 10(38) is that the consideration should be realized on transfer of long term

VINOD KUMAR SARAF HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

income-tax payable under section 115]B" From, a bare reading of the said section and Literal construction of the same about which there is not ambiguity, it is evident that the only requirement to be complied with by an assessee for claiming exemption under section 10(38) is that the consideration should be realized on transfer of long term

INDRA NARAYAN TRIPATHI,GORAKHPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE - 02,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Income Tax Appeal No.287 of 2011 dated 29.08.2013 and drew attention of the Bench to Para No.14 of the aforesaid judgment and order. 9 ITA.No.05/VNS/2020 Sri Indra Narayan Tripathi, Gorakhpur. Assessment Year 2014-15 8.1. The Learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that it was incumbent upon A.O. to have referred the matter to DVO for valuation keeping