Search: section 68

27 results for “section 68”+ Section 40clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)32 Section 40A(3)28 Section 36(1)(va)25 Section 14820 Section 139(1)18 Addition to Income18 Section 14717 Section 6815 Section 143(1)12

THE MAHABIR JUTE MILLS LIMITED,GORAKHPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2 , GORAKHPUR

In the result, (i) the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 is partly allowed and for AY 2020-21 is treated as allowed

ITA 351/ALLD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Nov 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 4Section 40A(3)

Section 68 inasmuch as it is not in dispute that the creditors outstanding related to purchases and the trading results were accepted by the AO. We are, therefore, of the opinion that no substantial question of law arises for consideration in this case. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.” 8.7 Since the assessing officer, in the instant case, has assessed

DCIT,, GORAKHPUR vs. M/S MAHABIR JITE MILLS, LTD., GORAKHPUR

Showing 1–20 of 27 · Page 1 of 2

THE MAHABIR JUTE MILLS LIMITED,GORAKHPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2 , GORAKHPUR

DCIT,, GORAKHPUR vs. M/S MAHABIR JITE MILLS, LTD., GORAKHPUR

THE MAHABIR JUTE MILLS LIMITED,GORAKHPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2 , GORAKHPUR

DCIT,, GORAKHPUR vs. M/S MAHABIR JITE MILLS, LTD., GORAKHPUR

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2 , GORAKHPUR vs. THE MAHABIR JUTE MILLS LIMITED, GORAKHPUR

THE MAHABIR JUTE MILLS LTD.,GORAKHPUR vs. ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

M/S U TOLL CORPORATION LTD.,,VARANASI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 02, VARANASI

SURENDRA NATH SINGH,,GHAZIPUR vs. ITO, WARD - 3(5), GHAZIPUR

KAMAL KUMAR AGRAWAL (HUF),VARANASI vs. A.C.I.T., C.C.,, VARANASI

KAMAL KUMAR AGRAWAL (HUF),VARANASI vs. A.C.I.T., C.C., VARANASI

KAMAL KUMAR AGRAWAL (HUF),VARANASI vs. A.C.I.T., C.C., VARANASI

KAMAL KUMAR AGRAWAL (HUF),VARANASI vs. A.C.I.T., C.C., VARANASI

KAMAL KUMAR AGRAWAL (HUF),VARANASI vs. A.C.I.T., C.C., VARANASI

M/S RUGS MART,VARANASI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 03, VARANASI

M/S AVANTIKA INFRAVENTURE (P) LTD.,,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VARANASI

M/S AVANTIKA INFRAVENTURE (P) LTD.,,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VARANASI

UTKARSH SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.,VARANASI vs. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

LAWKUSH SHARMA,SONEBHADRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3 (5), SONEBHADRA

M.W.S. & CO.,BHADOHI vs. DY. C.I.T., RANGE - 1, VARANASI

M.W.S. & CO.,BHADOHI vs. DY. C.I.T., RANGE - 1, VARANASI

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 02,, VARANASI

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 2, VARANASI