BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 17(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,339Mumbai2,210Bangalore684Chennai628Jaipur549Ahmedabad514Hyderabad462Kolkata422Pune259Chandigarh238Surat218Raipur180Indore165Visakhapatnam158Rajkot154Amritsar147Cochin82Guwahati72Lucknow71Agra70Cuttack66Patna63Nagpur56Dehradun46Allahabad41Jodhpur37Telangana34Karnataka31Panaji11Ranchi10SC6Kerala5Orissa4Gauhati3Jabalpur3Varanasi3Himachal Pradesh2Calcutta2Uttarakhand1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 14811Section 1475Section 2634Section 143(3)2Section 43B2Section 144r2Section 1442Section 143(2)2

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 02,, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 214/VNS/2019[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

147 was made against the income of Rs. 1.37 Crore as unexplained money and deemed to be the income of the assessee u/s 69A of the Act. 4. The assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(Appeal), Varanasi against the addition of Rs. 1.37 Crore. The written submission consist of statement of facts of appeal and submission before

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 2, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 213/VNS/2019[201-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

147 was made against the income of Rs. 1.37 Crore as unexplained money and deemed to be the income of the assessee u/s 69A of the Act. 4. The assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(Appeal), Varanasi against the addition of Rs. 1.37 Crore. The written submission consist of statement of facts of appeal and submission before

VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASI vs. CIT (E),, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 34/ALLD/2018[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi17 Jan 2023AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2007-08 Varanasi Development Authority, Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Pannalal Park, Raja Udai Pratap (Exemption), Lucknow Marg, Katchary, Varanasi Pan-Aaatv6811A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Sh. Ashish Bansal, Advocate Respondent By: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.01.2023 O R D E R

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 43B

2 Varanasi Development Authority 3. At the time of hearing, the learned counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessment order passed by the AO under section 147/143(3) dated 30.03.2015 has been quashed by the CIT(A), vide order dated 01.04.2022. He has filed a copy of the order passed by the CIT(A). Thus, the learned