BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 153(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,229Mumbai885Bangalore434Chennai405Jaipur222Hyderabad204Kolkata148Chandigarh111Ahmedabad88Pune75Amritsar62Raipur59Surat56Indore52Guwahati47Nagpur32Visakhapatnam31Patna31Telangana30Lucknow29Cuttack27Cochin24Allahabad22Rajkot20Karnataka18Jodhpur13Dehradun10Orissa4SC4Jabalpur3Panaji3Gauhati2Kerala2Varanasi2Rajasthan1Calcutta1Ranchi1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 14810Section 144r2Section 1442Section 143(2)2Section 1472

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 02,, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 214/VNS/2019[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

1) and no assessment was originally framed by Revenue u/s 143(3). Thus , first proviso to Section 147 is not applicable. Further , the income of the assessee allegedly escaping assessment was Rs.1,37,00,000/- based on the information received by AO from ADIT(Inv.) , Kolkatta , and the AO had reasons to believe that the income of the assessee

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 2, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 213/VNS/2019[201-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

1) and no assessment was originally framed by Revenue u/s 143(3). Thus , first proviso to Section 147 is not applicable. Further , the income of the assessee allegedly escaping assessment was Rs.1,37,00,000/- based on the information received by AO from ADIT(Inv.) , Kolkatta , and the AO had reasons to believe that the income of the assessee