Search: reassessment u/s 147

7 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 142(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14815 Section 1479 Section 271(1)(b)7 Section 1446 Section 253(3)5 Section 2634 Reassessment4 Section 249(4)(b)3 Section 143(3)

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 02,, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 214/VNS/2019[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR

Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

reassessment was framed by the AO without issuing notice u/s 143(2). The assessee never filed any return of income in pursuance to notice issued by the AO u/s 148, and hence the AO rightly invoked provisions of Section 144 and framed best judgment assessment. The AO duly issued notices u/s 142(1) as well SCN u/s 144 , dated

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 02,, VARANASI

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 02,, VARANASI

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 2, VARANASI

SMT. ANITA AWASTHI,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD - 3(5), SONEBHADRA

VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASI vs. CIT (E),, LUCKNOW

RADHEY SHYAM,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3), VARANASI

SHRI PRAKASH YADAV,BALLIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD - 2(4), BALLIA

RISHIKESH SHUKLA,SINGRAULI vs. ITO, WARD - III (1), MIRZAPUR