RISHIKESH SHUKLA,SINGRAULI vs. ITO, WARD - III (1), MIRZAPUR
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 124/VNS/2020[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi19 May 2023AY 2009-2010
Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year:2009-10 Shri Rishikesh Shukla, Income Tax Officer, S/O Shri K. P. Shukla, V. Ward-Iii(1), Sharma Colony, Mirzapur,U.P.. Waidhan,Singrauli-486886, Madhya Pradesh . Pan:Bcmps8094M (Appellant) (Respondent)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 253(3)
80C claim of Rs.34,800/- on account of not furnishing proof of investment.”
3. At the outset, it is observed that this appeal is filed late beyond the time stipulated under the 1961 Act by 224 days. The assessee has filed an application requesting for condonation of delay. The reasons for filing this appeal delay as stated by the assessee
