VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASI vs. CIT (E),, LUCKNOW
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 34/ALLD/2018[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi17 Jan 2023AY 2007-2008
Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2007-08 Varanasi Development Authority, Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Pannalal Park, Raja Udai Pratap (Exemption), Lucknow Marg, Katchary, Varanasi Pan-Aaatv6811A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Sh. Ashish Bansal, Advocate Respondent By: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.01.2023 O R D E R
For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 43B
ii. Water tax iii. Sewer tax iv. Legal fee v. Registration money payable
But the assessee has not actually paid these taxes / fees and therefore, the same are not allowable expenditure as per the provisions of section 43B of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the CIT(E) was of the view that the AO has overlooked these facts
