SUJIT KUMAR AGRAWAL (HUF),VARANASI vs. ACIT, CC, VARANASI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 28/VNS/2021[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Jul 2022AY 2014-2015
Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharay: 2014-15 Sujit Kumar Agrawal (Huf) V Assistant Commissioner Of 72, Jawahar Nagar Extension Bhelupur, . Income Tax, Central Circle, Varanasi-221005, Uttar Pradesh Varanasi Pan-Aaohs5397C (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Sh. Asim Zafar, Adv Respondent By: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 07.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 07.07.2022 O R D E R
For Appellant: Sh. Asim Zafar, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 253(3)Section 4Section 68
2), Varanasi under section 143(3) of the Act] in relation to an issue relating to addition of Rs.
61,42,646/- by treating “long term capital gain” (disclosed by the appellant) as bogus, under section 68. 5. Because the order appealed against is contrary to the facts, law and principles of natural justice.”
5. The learned
