VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASI vs. CIT (E),, LUCKNOW
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 34/ALLD/2018[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi17 Jan 2023AY 2007-2008
Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2007-08 Varanasi Development Authority, Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Pannalal Park, Raja Udai Pratap (Exemption), Lucknow Marg, Katchary, Varanasi Pan-Aaatv6811A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Sh. Ashish Bansal, Advocate Respondent By: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.01.2023 O R D E R
For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 43B
3), the AO has demonstrated that there was failure one part of the appellant to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment.
Therefore the appellant's contentions on this issue ate accepted and new of the Proviso to Section 147, the reassessment proceedings 147 are liable to be quashed on this Issue alone on the ground that
