BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 15clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,586Mumbai3,770Chennai1,262Bangalore1,138Kolkata756Hyderabad566Ahmedabad558Jaipur517Chandigarh297Pune265Raipur226Indore203Karnataka193Rajkot166Amritsar157Surat148Cochin125Patna117Visakhapatnam105Nagpur98Guwahati89Lucknow82Cuttack79Telangana77Jodhpur61Agra59Dehradun54Ranchi51SC38Allahabad36Panaji27Calcutta19Orissa12Jabalpur9Rajasthan9Kerala7A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Gauhati3Punjab & Haryana2Himachal Pradesh2Varanasi2Uttarakhand1J&K1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 1474Section 2634Section 143(3)3Section 1482Section 43B2Reassessment2

VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASI vs. CIT (E),, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 34/ALLD/2018[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi17 Jan 2023AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2007-08 Varanasi Development Authority, Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Pannalal Park, Raja Udai Pratap (Exemption), Lucknow Marg, Katchary, Varanasi Pan-Aaatv6811A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Sh. Ashish Bansal, Advocate Respondent By: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.01.2023 O R D E R

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 43B

Section 147, the reassessment proceedings 147 are liable to be quashed on this Issue alone on the ground that they are illegal and bad in law. ISSUE NO.3 10.1 Thirdly, apart from above, the appellant has also raised the ground of appeal that the AO was duty bound to pass a speaking order accepting or rejecting the objections raised

RISHIKESH SHUKLA,SINGRAULI vs. ITO, WARD - III (1), MIRZAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 124/VNS/2020[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi19 May 2023AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year:2009-10 Shri Rishikesh Shukla, Income Tax Officer, S/O Shri K. P. Shukla, V. Ward-Iii(1), Sharma Colony, Mirzapur,U.P.. Waidhan,Singrauli-486886, Madhya Pradesh . Pan:Bcmps8094M (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 253(3)

15-09-2015. The addition and/or modifications made by the Ld. ITO are briefly stated here-in-below: The reasons recorded by the Ld. ITO that assessee did not cooperate is not justified since the counsel of the assessee regularly attended the hearings and was in the process to compile and collating the details. The impugned order passed