VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASI vs. CIT (E),, LUCKNOW
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 34/ALLD/2018[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi17 Jan 2023AY 2007-2008
Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2007-08 Varanasi Development Authority, Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Pannalal Park, Raja Udai Pratap (Exemption), Lucknow Marg, Katchary, Varanasi Pan-Aaatv6811A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Sh. Ashish Bansal, Advocate Respondent By: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.01.2023 O R D E R
For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 43B
139 or in response to a notice issued under sub-section [1] of section 142 or section 148 or to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment, for that assessment year."
9.3
Nowhere in the reassessment order passed u/s 147/143(3), the AO has demonstrated that there was failure one part of the appellant to disclose
