Search: reassessment

9 results for “reassessment”+ Cash Depositclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14727 Section 14827 Section 1447 Section 271(1)(b)7 Cash Deposit5 Reassessment5 Section 271(1)(c)4 Addition to Income4 Section 249(4)(b)3 Section 68

RISHIKESH SHUKLA,SINGRAULI vs. ITO, WARD - III (1), MIRZAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 124/VNS/2020[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi19 May 2023AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year:2009-10 Shri Rishikesh Shukla, Income Tax Officer, S/O Shri K. P. Shukla, V. Ward-Iii(1), Sharma Colony, Mirzapur,U.P.. Waidhan,Singrauli-486886, Madhya Pradesh . Pan:Bcmps8094M (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 253(3)

cash was deposited by the assessee in his bank account during the year under consideration , the Revenue has validly started the enquiry but the assessee did not respond to notices sent by the ITO, Rewa, M.P., and then the AO i.e. ITO, Rewa, M.P. had issued notice u/s 148 of the Act. The notice u/s 148 was issued within four

RISHIKESH SHUKLA,SINGRAULI vs. ITO, WARD - III (1), MIRZAPUR

SHRI PRAKASH YADAV,BALLIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD - 2(4), BALLIA

RISHIKESH SHUKLA,SINGRAULI vs. ITO, WARD - III (1), MIRZAPUR

SHRI PRAKASH YADAV,BALLIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD - 2(4), BALLIA

PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA,AZAMGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICER

PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA,AZAMGARH vs. ITO WARD3(1), INCOME TAX OFFICE AZAMGARH

RAGHAWENDRA PRATAP SINGH,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, CIRCLE - 02,, VARANASI

SHRI RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA,,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, JOUNPUR, JAUNPUR

SMT. ANITA AWASTHI,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD - 3(5), SONEBHADRA

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 02,, VARANASI

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 2, VARANASI