BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment”+ Business Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,493Delhi3,858Chennai1,292Bangalore1,104Kolkata906Jaipur794Ahmedabad751Pune595Hyderabad571Chandigarh330Surat285Indore281Rajkot234Raipur230Cochin225Visakhapatnam202Amritsar183Cuttack158Patna134Nagpur128Karnataka125Agra96Guwahati90Lucknow90Jodhpur74Telangana72Ranchi59Dehradun56Allahabad38SC27Panaji25Calcutta13Kerala13Jabalpur11Rajasthan9Orissa7Varanasi5Punjab & Haryana3Gauhati2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Madhya Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 14818Section 270A8Section 143(2)5Section 1473Addition to Income3Section 133A2Section 144r2Section 1442Reassessment2

KAHM PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.,VARANASI vs. DC/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VARANASI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 63/VNS/2023[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi26 Sept 2023AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri. B. R. Baskaran & Shri Amit Shuklaassessment Year:2018-19 M/S Kahm Properties Pvt. Ltd. V. The Dc/Acit B-21/192, Kamaccha Central Circle Varanasai Varanasi Tan/Pan:Aacck7739F (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri V. K. Jindal Respondent By: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R. Date Of Hearing: 26 09 2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 29 09 2023

For Appellant: Shri V. K. JindalFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R
Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 270ASection 270A(9)

business premises of the assessee. In the survey proceedings, the assessee admitted certain undisclosed income, amounting to Rs.15,89,684/- on account of undisclosed rent received on lawn booking. The assessee has also paid due taxes on the admitted income. Thereafter, the assessee’s case was selected for scrutiny and notice under section 143(2) of the Act was issued

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 2, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 213/VNS/2019[201-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

reassessment as there Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11 Mousami Choudhury, District Varanasi v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2, Varanasi were reasons to believe that the income of the assessee to the tune of Rs. 1,37,00,000/- chargeable to income-tax has escaped assessment based on information received by AO from ADIT(Inv.) ,Kolkatta

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 02,, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 214/VNS/2019[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

reassessment as there Assessment Years: 2009-10 & 2010-11 Mousami Choudhury, District Varanasi v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2, Varanasi were reasons to believe that the income of the assessee to the tune of Rs. 1,37,00,000/- chargeable to income-tax has escaped assessment based on information received by AO from ADIT(Inv.) ,Kolkatta

RISHIKESH SHUKLA,SINGRAULI vs. ITO, WARD - III (1), MIRZAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 124/VNS/2020[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi19 May 2023AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year:2009-10 Shri Rishikesh Shukla, Income Tax Officer, S/O Shri K. P. Shukla, V. Ward-Iii(1), Sharma Colony, Mirzapur,U.P.. Waidhan,Singrauli-486886, Madhya Pradesh . Pan:Bcmps8094M (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 253(3)

Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Varanasi Circuit Bench, Varanasi (hereinafter called “the Tribunal”) reads as under: “1. The impugned reassessment order dated 19.11.2019 passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) is null and void because it suffers from jurisdictional material and it has been made without jurisdiction and authority of law. There is no record of satisfaction and sanction for issue

SHRI RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA,,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, JOUNPUR, JAUNPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 8/VNS/2020[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi22 Mar 2022AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Raoassessment Year 2008-09 Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Vs. I.T.O., 1St Floor, Awadh Apartment, Jaunpur Nagaria Chawraha, Thakurganj, Lucknow - 226003 Pan –Afvpg1623B (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 148

reassessment framed thereafter all are without jurisdiction the assessment framed the same be quashed. 3. Because the ld. ld. CIT(A) passed the order without given proper opportunity of being heard, that is bad in law and liable to remand back to ld. ld. CIT(A). 2 4. Because there is no reasons recorded u/s 148(ii) of the Income