Search: penalty u/s 271

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Set Off of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(a)18 Section 80P18 Section 143(3)14 Penalty7 Section 2546 Section 2(19)6 Section 2716 Section 36 Section 226

M/S ROYAL SYMBOL REAL ESTATE AGROTECH CORPORATION LTD.,BALLIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(5), BALLIA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 34/VNS/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi13 Apr 2023AY 2014-2015

For Appellant: Shri O.P.Shukla,Advocate.ARFor Respondent: Shri .A.K. Singh.DR

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 69

loss of Rs.6,83,308/-.The AO has initiated penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act and, in the penalty proceedings the AO has considered the additions made in the original assessment u/s. 143(3) of the Act aggregating to Rs.16,45,000/- The assessee has filed the explanations on the show cause notice issued

M/S ROYAL SYMBOL REAL ESTATE AGROTECH CORPORATION LTD.,BALLIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(5), BALLIA

M/S ROYAL SYMBOL REAL ESTATE AGROTECH CORPORATION LTD.,BALLIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(5), BALLIA

DY. C. I. T., CIRCLE - 1, GORAKHPUR vs. BARODA UTTAR PRADESH GRAMIN BANK NOW AMALGAMATED WITH BARODA U.P. BANK, GORAKHPUR

DY. C. I. T., CIRCLE - 1, GORAKHPUR vs. BARODA UTTAR PRADESH GRAMIN BANK NOW AMALGAMATED WITH BARODA U.P. BANK, GORAKHPUR

DY. C. I. T., CIRCLE - 1, GORAKHPUR vs. BARODA UTTAR PRADESH GRAMIN BANK NOW AMALGAMATED WITH BARODA U.P. BANK, GORAKHPUR

DY. C. I. T., CIRCLE - 1, GORAKHPUR vs. BARODA UTTAR PRADESH GRAMIN BANK NOW AMALGAMATED WITH BARODA U.P. BANK, GORAKHPUR

DY. C. I. T., CIRCLE - 1, GORAKHPUR vs. BARODA UTTAR PRADESH GRAMIN BANK NOW AMALGAMATED WITH BARODA U.P. BANK, GORAKHPUR

DY. C. I. T., CIRCLE - 1, GORAKHPUR vs. BARODA UTTAR PRADESH GRAMIN BANK NOW AMALGAMATED WITH BARODA U. P.. BANK, GORAKHPUR