Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 69clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14718 Section 1486 Section 1444 Section 271(1)(c)4 Penalty3 Section 142(1)2 Section 1512 Addition to Income2 Natural Justice

PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA,AZAMGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 125/VNS/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi10 Oct 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: S/Shri Piyush Kumar Kamal and Abhishek Kumar Gupta, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Smt Amandeep Kaur, D.R

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 271(1)(c)

penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act by passing an order ex-parte qua the assessee. 4.0 Now, the assessee has approached this Tribunal challenging the orders of the AO as well as the NFAC by raising the following grounds of appeal: GROUNDS RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE IN ITA NO.125/VNS/2023: 1. That the learned Commissioner of Income

PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA,AZAMGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICER

PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA,AZAMGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICER

PANKAJ KUMAR GUPTA,AZAMGARH vs. ITO WARD3(1), INCOME TAX OFFICE AZAMGARH

SANJAY TIWARI,GORAKHPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1), GORAKHPUR

M/S BANARAS SWARN KALA KENDRA PVT. LTD.,,VARANASI vs. ACIT, CC, VARANASI