Search: penalty u/s 271

1 result for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 271Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi24 Jaipur20 Chennai20 Kolkata19 Mumbai16 Rajkot15 Bangalore13 Ahmedabad12 Indore12 Visakhapatnam10 Hyderabad9 Raipur9 Pune4 Chandigarh3 Surat3 Nagpur3 Amritsar2 Guwahati1 Jabalpur1 Allahabad1 Varanasi1 Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)6

RAEES ALAM SIDDIQUI,GHAZIPUR vs. DY. C.I.T., RANGE - 1, VARANASI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 39/VNS/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi31 Dec 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Arvind Shukla, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amandeep Kaur, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

u/s 271(1)(c) without appreciating that the Ld. A.O. levied penalty without establishing that the explanation furnished by the appellant was false. 6. Because on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC erred in upholding penalty order pervasive to binding decisions interpreting provision explained by courts. 7. Because