Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 2(15)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)8 Addition to Income3 Natural Justice2

DILIP KUMAR SINGH,BALLIA vs. ITO, WARD - 2(4),, BALLIA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 72/VNS/2018[2010-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi22 Jul 2022AY 2010-2012

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharay: 2010-11 Sh. Dilip Kumar Singh, V. Income Tax Officer, Sarani Koth, Sikanderpur, Ballia, Ward-2(4), Ballia Uttar Pradesh Pan-Adups6163M (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: None Respondent By: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 05.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 22.07.2022 O R D E R

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) which was confirmed by the CIT(A) on the addition of Rs. 3,11,649/- which was made by the CIT(A) being enhancement of assessment during the quantum appellate proceedings. Though the assessee has explained that it was not a case of concealment as the assessee has voluntarily revised the computation

DILIP KUMAR SINGH,BALLIA vs. ITO, WARD - 2(4),, BALLIA

M/S BANARAS SWARN KALA KENDRA PVT. LTD.,,VARANASI vs. ACIT, CC, VARANASI

DILIP KUMAR SINGH,BALLIA vs. ITO, WARD - 2(4),, BALLIA

M/S BANARAS SWARN KALA KENDRA PVT. LTD.,,VARANASI vs. ACIT, CC, VARANASI

M/S RAJENDRA PRASAD SRIVASTAVA,AZAMGARH vs. ACIT, RANGE - AZAMGARH, AZAMGARH