6 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 13clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed
Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharay: 2010-11 Sh. Dilip Kumar Singh, V. Income Tax Officer, Sarani Koth, Sikanderpur, Ballia, Ward-2(4), Ballia Uttar Pradesh Pan-Adups6163M (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: None Respondent By: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 05.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 22.07.2022 O R D E R
section 271(1)(c) in para 13 of the impugned order as under:- “13. As regards, the appellant contention that since the appellant has himself disclosed the concealment as confirmed by the ITAT, during the course of appellate proceedings before the CIT(A) and, accordingly, no penalty should be imposed. The 4 Dilip Kumar Singh disclosure of additional income