Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Natural Justiceclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 142(1)3 Section 143(2)2 Section 143(3)2 Section 1442 Penalty2 Addition to Income2

SANJAY TIWARI,GORAKHPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1), GORAKHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 22/VNS/2021[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi13 Feb 2023AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2015-16 Sanjay Tiwari V. The Ito Prop. Tiwari Automobiles Ward 2(1) Bewari Chowk, Gola Bazar Gorakhpur Gorakhpur Pan:Agupt4822H (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: None Respondent By: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R. Date Of Hearing: 09 02 2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 13 02 2023 O R D E R

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144ASection 271B

natural justice and law of equity be necessary relief be allowed and directed to drop the penalty proceedings initiated u/s 271B as the turnover is below Rs.1 crore 2 Sanjay Tiwari and appellant is not liable to get the accounts audited u/s 144AB of I.T. Act 1961. 4. The only grievance of the assessee is regarding non- exclusion

SANJAY TIWARI,GORAKHPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1), GORAKHPUR

SANJAY TIWARI,GORAKHPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1), GORAKHPUR

M/S ROYAL SYMBOL REAL ESTATE AGROTECH CORPORATION LTD.,BALLIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(5), BALLIA