Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Condonation of Delayclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(b)7 Section 271(1)(c)3 Section 142(1)3 Section 2742 Section 1442 Section 1472 Penalty2

SMT. ANITA AWASTHI,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD - 3(5), SONEBHADRA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 243/VNS/2019[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi03 Jun 2022AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2010-11 Smt. Anita Awasthi, Ito, Ward-3(5), 1142, Block-36, V. Income Tax Office, Sonebhadra, Rangoli Gardens, Uttar Pradesh Kanakpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302021 Pan:Acbpa9520E (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri T.P. Shukla, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 271(1)(b)Section 273B

penalty orders u/s 271(1)(b) and that of u/s 271(1)(c). Delay caused in this regard is beyond control of the appellant and so she requests your good-self ta condone

SMT. ANITA AWASTHI,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD - 3(5), SONEBHADRA

SMT. ANITA AWASTHI,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD - 3(5), SONEBHADRA

GORAKH NATH YADAV,VARANASI vs. ITA, WARD - 3(4), VARANASI