Search: house property

1 result for “house property”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur29 Bangalore24 Mumbai22 Karnataka21 Delhi14 Hyderabad13 Chennai11 Agra10 Ahmedabad8 Surat5 Pune4 Chandigarh3 Kolkata3 Cochin2 Amritsar2 Cuttack2 Varanasi1 Dehradun1 Indore1 Jabalpur1 Nagpur1 Rajkot1 SC1

Key Topics

Section 271D8 Section 269S4

BANDANA PANDEY,GORAKHPUR vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE - 01,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 106/VNS/2019[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi03 Jun 2022AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2012-13 Smt. Bandana Pandey Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax , W/O Shri Shyam Chandra V. Range-1, Gorakhpur, U.P. Pandey, 29-B, Betihata South, Awas Vikas Colony, Gorakhpur-273001, U.P. Pan:Atopb4997J (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P.K Srivastava, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 144Section 269SSection 271D

property. It was also submitted that Section 269SS has no applicability, if the loan is taken by wife from husband , and vice versa , as they are close family members. It was submitted that the residential house was purchased for self use and the husband of the assessee provided financial help to the assessee for purchase of the residential house