BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “house property”+ Reopening of Assessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,232Delhi1,005Chennai439Bangalore380Jaipur285Hyderabad230Surat191Karnataka190Ahmedabad164Chandigarh162Pune157Kolkata139Visakhapatnam117Indore88Cochin78Raipur66Rajkot58Calcutta52Amritsar51Lucknow47Nagpur34Cuttack33Patna29Guwahati29Agra27Dehradun10Telangana10Jodhpur9SC9Allahabad5Ranchi5Varanasi4Panaji3Kerala2Rajasthan2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Jabalpur1Andhra Pradesh1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 14810Section 69B2Section 1322Section 153C2Section 144r2Section 1442Section 143(2)2Section 1472Addition to Income2

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 2, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 213/VNS/2019[201-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

reopening of the assessment was validly done by the AO. Reference is drawn to provisions of Section 147 and 148 of the 1961 Act , which were in force at relevant time reads as under: Income escaping assessment. 147. If the [Assessing] Officer [has reason to believe] that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any assessment year

Search & Seizure2

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 02,, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 214/VNS/2019[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

reopening of the assessment was validly done by the AO. Reference is drawn to provisions of Section 147 and 148 of the 1961 Act , which were in force at relevant time reads as under: Income escaping assessment. 147. If the [Assessing] Officer [has reason to believe] that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any assessment year

ACIT, CC,, VARANASI vs. M/S D.S. INFRAHEIGHTS PVT. LTD.,, VARANASI

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 114/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi23 Nov 2023AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 132Section 153CSection 69B

reopened under section 153C of the Act. 4. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer examined the shareholding pattern of both the assessee companies herein. He found that the shareholders of both the companies were M/s. Tulsiani Construction and Developers Pvt. Ltd. and KBG Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., each of them holding 50% of shares. The Assessing Officer further

ACIT, CC, VARANASI vs. M/S VATIKA NIRMAN PVT. LTD.,, LUCKNOW

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 115/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi23 Nov 2023AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 132Section 153CSection 69B

reopened under section 153C of the Act. 4. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer examined the shareholding pattern of both the assessee companies herein. He found that the shareholders of both the companies were M/s. Tulsiani Construction and Developers Pvt. Ltd. and KBG Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., each of them holding 50% of shares. The Assessing Officer further