BANDANA PANDEY,GORAKHPUR vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE - 01,, GORAKHPUR
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 106/VNS/2019[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi03 Jun 2022AY 2012-2013
Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2012-13 Smt. Bandana Pandey Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax , W/O Shri Shyam Chandra V. Range-1, Gorakhpur, U.P. Pandey, 29-B, Betihata South, Awas Vikas Colony, Gorakhpur-273001, U.P. Pan:Atopb4997J (Appellant) (Respondent)
For Appellant: Shri P.K Srivastava, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 269SSection 271D
property. It was also submitted that Section 269SS has no applicability, if the loan is taken by wife from husband , and vice versa , as they are close family members. It was submitted that the residential house was purchased for self use and the husband of the assessee provided financial help to the assessee for purchase of the residential house
