BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 95clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,725Delhi2,965Chennai926Bangalore878Ahmedabad838Kolkata804Pune608Hyderabad557Jaipur406Indore329Chandigarh289Surat199Cochin179Visakhapatnam172Raipur140Cuttack105Amritsar100Lucknow96Agra88Rajkot78Nagpur73Guwahati62Calcutta47Karnataka46Ranchi46Patna36Allahabad27Jodhpur23Telangana23Dehradun21SC20Panaji17Jabalpur15Varanasi5Punjab & Haryana2Orissa2Kerala2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 40A(3)28Section 54F13Section 143(3)5Deduction5Disallowance5Addition to Income5Section 133A4Section 14A4Section 44Survey u/s 133A

THE MAHABIR JUTE MILLS LIMITED,GORAKHPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2 , GORAKHPUR

In the result, (i) the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 is partly allowed and for AY 2020-21 is treated as allowed

ITA 351/ALLD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Nov 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 4Section 40A(3)

95,800/-. 6. The next issue contested by the assessee relates to the disallowance made u/s 14A of the Act. 6.1 The AO noticed that the assessee has made investments to the tune of Rs.2.00 crores on 26-03-2009. Accordingly, the AO took the view that a portion of expenses should be disallowed

DCIT,, GORAKHPUR vs. M/S MAHABIR JITE MILLS, LTD., GORAKHPUR

4

In the result, (i) the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 is partly allowed and for AY 2020-21 is treated as allowed

ITA 448/ALLD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Nov 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 4Section 40A(3)

95,800/-. 6. The next issue contested by the assessee relates to the disallowance made u/s 14A of the Act. 6.1 The AO noticed that the assessee has made investments to the tune of Rs.2.00 crores on 26-03-2009. Accordingly, the AO took the view that a portion of expenses should be disallowed

THE MAHABIR JUTE MILLS LTD.,GORAKHPUR vs. ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, (i) the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 is partly allowed and for AY 2020-21 is treated as allowed

ITA 13/VNS/2023[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Nov 2023AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 4Section 40A(3)

95,800/-. 6. The next issue contested by the assessee relates to the disallowance made u/s 14A of the Act. 6.1 The AO noticed that the assessee has made investments to the tune of Rs.2.00 crores on 26-03-2009. Accordingly, the AO took the view that a portion of expenses should be disallowed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2 , GORAKHPUR vs. THE MAHABIR JUTE MILLS LIMITED, GORAKHPUR

In the result, (i) the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 is partly allowed and for AY 2020-21 is treated as allowed

ITA 217/ALLD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 4Section 40A(3)

95,800/-. 6. The next issue contested by the assessee relates to the disallowance made u/s 14A of the Act. 6.1 The AO noticed that the assessee has made investments to the tune of Rs.2.00 crores on 26-03-2009. Accordingly, the AO took the view that a portion of expenses should be disallowed

MIRZA ARIF BEG,GORAKHPUR vs. ACIT, RANGE - 1, GORAKHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 100/VNS/2019[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi26 May 2022AY 2014-2015

Bench: Hon’Ble Sh.Vijay Pal Rao & Hon’Ble Sh. Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2014-15 Mirza Arif Beg, V. Commissioner Of Income Tax, H. No. 184-B, New Colony, New Range-1, Gorakhpur Beniganj Chowk, Jafra Bazar, Gorakhpur, U.P. Pan-Abxpb6421C (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Sh. Subhash Chand, Advocate Respondent By: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 26.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 26.05.2022

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash Chand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 54F

95,910/- on account of long term capital gains. 3. Because the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal has erred in law of facts in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,39,900/- on account of Commission. 4. Because the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal has erred in law of facts in confirming the addition