Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 47clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,079 Delhi1,989 Chennai496 Bangalore480 Ahmedabad374 Hyderabad362 Jaipur346 Kolkata297 Chandigarh212 Indore199 Raipur194 Pune194 Cochin117 Visakhapatnam109 Surat107 Rajkot99 Amritsar79 Nagpur73 Lucknow69 Guwahati51 Ranchi48 Allahabad44 SC39 Jodhpur33 Patna30 Cuttack28 Panaji22 Agra22 Dehradun10 Jabalpur9 Varanasi5 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1 RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1

Key Topics

Section 40A(3)28 Section 143(3)5 Disallowance5 Addition to Income5 Section 133A4 Section 14A4 Section 44 Deduction4 Survey u/s 133A4

VIMAL MISHRA,VARANASI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER CIRCLE -3 VARANASI, VARANASI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 110/VNS/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi05 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 143(3)Section 47(1)

disallowance @10%. No finding has been given by them, to explain how section 47(1) of ITAT, which is the relevant

THE MAHABIR JUTE MILLS LIMITED,GORAKHPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2 , GORAKHPUR

In the result, (i) the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 is partly allowed and for AY 2020-21 is treated as allowed

ITA 351/ALLD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Nov 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 4Section 40A(3)

47. On consideration of totality of facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any justification for rejection of accounts by invoking section 145 of the Act and making impugned addition. Rs.3,64,60,658/-.” 18.3 We heard the parties on this issue and perused the record. We notice that the Ld CIT(A) has taken cognizance

DCIT,, GORAKHPUR vs. M/S MAHABIR JITE MILLS, LTD., GORAKHPUR

In the result, (i) the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 is partly allowed and for AY 2020-21 is treated as allowed

ITA 448/ALLD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Nov 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 4Section 40A(3)

47. On consideration of totality of facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any justification for rejection of accounts by invoking section 145 of the Act and making impugned addition. Rs.3,64,60,658/-.” 18.3 We heard the parties on this issue and perused the record. We notice that the Ld CIT(A) has taken cognizance

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2 , GORAKHPUR vs. THE MAHABIR JUTE MILLS LIMITED, GORAKHPUR

In the result, (i) the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 is partly allowed and for AY 2020-21 is treated as allowed

ITA 217/ALLD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 4Section 40A(3)

47. On consideration of totality of facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any justification for rejection of accounts by invoking section 145 of the Act and making impugned addition. Rs.3,64,60,658/-.” 18.3 We heard the parties on this issue and perused the record. We notice that the Ld CIT(A) has taken cognizance

THE MAHABIR JUTE MILLS LTD.,GORAKHPUR vs. ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, (i) the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 is partly allowed and for AY 2020-21 is treated as allowed

ITA 13/VNS/2023[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Nov 2023AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 4Section 40A(3)

47. On consideration of totality of facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any justification for rejection of accounts by invoking section 145 of the Act and making impugned addition. Rs.3,64,60,658/-.” 18.3 We heard the parties on this issue and perused the record. We notice that the Ld CIT(A) has taken cognizance