BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,436Delhi1,589Kolkata1,079Bangalore809Chennai698Ahmedabad615Pune499Jaipur336Hyderabad317Indore243Chandigarh224Surat195Cochin181Visakhapatnam169Raipur168Rajkot166Cuttack114Karnataka87Nagpur78Panaji67Amritsar60Calcutta57Jodhpur55Lucknow54Agra30Allahabad29Telangana27Patna27Guwahati24Jabalpur22Ranchi21SC11Dehradun11Varanasi5Kerala4Punjab & Haryana4Orissa2Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 14810Section 270A8Section 2638Section 143(2)6Section 143(3)4Section 40A(3)3Addition to Income3Section 133A2Section 43C2Disallowance

ACIT, CIRCLE - 1, GORAKHPUR vs. BAJRANG BAHADUR SINGH, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal filed by Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 49/VNS/2018[2012-2013]Status: HeardITAT Varanasi31 May 2022AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2012-13 The Assistant Shri Bajrang Bahadur Singh, Commissioner Of Income V. Marhatha, Campierganj, Tax,Circle-1, Gorakhpur-273001, Uttar Aayakarbhawan, Civil Pradesh Lines, Gorakhpur 273001, Uttar Pradesh Pan:Afxps6284G (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: ShriRamendra Kumar
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 263Section 40A(3)

Section 263 of the 1961 Act. 5.3 There were other addition being made by the AO to the tune of Rs. 3,37,200/- on account of disallowance

2
Revision u/s 2632

MANTRA MAJESTIQUE ASSOCIATES AOP,,VARANASI vs. PCIT, VARANASI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 7/VNS/2021[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi01 Sept 2021AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoorassessment Year: 2016-17 Mantra Majestique Associates, V. Pr. Cit Aop Allahabad Flat No.22, S-20/53-1 Sunderam Villa, Varuna Bridge Budha Vihar Colony Varanasi Tan/Pan:Aadam0702H (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri V. K. Jindal, C.A. Respondent By: Smt. Abha Kala Chanda, Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing: 12 08 2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 01 09 2021 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri V. K. Jindal, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Abha Kala Chanda, CIT (DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 43C

263 deserves to be cancelled in limine. 2. Because the learned Pr. CIT grossly erred in holding that the original assessment order passes s.143 (3) dated 03.05.2018 is erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Page 2 of 6 the revenue and Ld. Pr. CIT also erred in cancelling the original assessment order of AO and directing AO for framing

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 02,, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 214/VNS/2019[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

263 or section 26433[or an order of the Settlement Commission under sub-section (4) of section 245D], the amount of tax on which interest was payable under this sub-section has been increased or reduced, as the case may be, the interest shall be increased or reduced accordingly, and— (i) in a case where the interest is increased

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 2, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 213/VNS/2019[201-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

263 or section 26433[or an order of the Settlement Commission under sub-section (4) of section 245D], the amount of tax on which interest was payable under this sub-section has been increased or reduced, as the case may be, the interest shall be increased or reduced accordingly, and— (i) in a case where the interest is increased

KAHM PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.,VARANASI vs. DC/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VARANASI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 63/VNS/2023[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi26 Sept 2023AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri. B. R. Baskaran & Shri Amit Shuklaassessment Year:2018-19 M/S Kahm Properties Pvt. Ltd. V. The Dc/Acit B-21/192, Kamaccha Central Circle Varanasai Varanasi Tan/Pan:Aacck7739F (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri V. K. Jindal Respondent By: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R. Date Of Hearing: 26 09 2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 29 09 2023

For Appellant: Shri V. K. JindalFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R
Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 270ASection 270A(9)

disallowance has formed the basis of imposition of penalty in the case of the person for the same or any other assessment year. (12) The penalty referred to in sub-section (1) shall be imposed, by an order in writing, by the Assessing Officer, the Commissioner (Appeals), the Commissioner or the Principal Commissioner, as the case