BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 255(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai758Delhi710Bangalore242Chennai214Kolkata149Jaipur99Chandigarh83Ahmedabad76Raipur61Hyderabad57Pune37Surat36Calcutta36Panaji34Karnataka27Guwahati27Allahabad22Rajkot21Lucknow21Indore17Amritsar15Cochin15Jodhpur12Visakhapatnam10Nagpur8Telangana5SC4Cuttack3Dehradun3Jabalpur3Varanasi3Orissa2Ranchi2Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 69A4Section 69C4Addition to Income3Section 255(4)2Section 124(3)(a)2Section 124(2)2Section 250(1)2Disallowance2

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2 (1),, VARANASI vs. PROMINENT DATAMATICS MARKETING PVT. LTD., , VARANASI

ITA 135/VNS/2020[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi05 Jan 2026AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 124(1)(a)Section 124(2)Section 124(3)(a)Section 250(1)Section 255(4)Section 69A

255(4) of the I.T. Act PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:A.M. (A) In this case, there was difference of opinion between Hon'ble Judicial Member and Hon'ble Accountant Member. The Hon'ble Judicial Member referred the question of difference to Hon'ble Third Member, as under: I.T.A. No.135/VNS/2020 2 C.IO.No.04/VNS/2021 Assessment Year:2017-18 “1. Whether

CHAMRU RAM,CHANDAULI vs. DC/ACIT, CIRCLE - 3, VARANASI

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 14/VNS/2023[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi05 Jan 2026AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 145(3)Section 255(4)Section 69ASection 69C

255(4) of the I.T. Act PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:A.M. (A) This appeal has been filed by the assessee against impugned appellate order, dated 19/01/2023 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1048934293(1). The grounds of appeal are as under: “1. Because it was fully explained that the books of account have been maintained in due course of business reveals fully and truly

M/S BANARAS SWARN KALA KENDRA PVT. LTD.,,VARANASI vs. ACIT, CC, VARANASI

ITA 4/VNS/2019[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi21 Nov 2022AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2011-12 M/S. Banaras Swarn Kala Kendra Pvt. Ltd., The Assistant Commissioner Of Ck-65/70A, Bari Piari, V. Income Tax, Varanasi-221002, U.P. Central Circle, Aaykar Bhawan, M A Road, Varanasi-221002, U.P. Pan:Aaccb1623M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assesseeby: Shri A.K. Pandey, Advocate Revenue By: Shri Neeraj Kumar, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 25.08.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 21.11.2022

For Appellant: Shri A.K. Pandey, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Neeraj Kumar, CIT DR
Section 132Section 153A

disallowance of claim of bad debts reached finality. 7. The assessee being aggrieved filed first appeal before Ld. CIT(A) and assessee submitted before CIT(A) that there was no excess stock found during the course of search and infact quantitative term, the excess difference of 503.365 grms was found , and the assessee submitted a reconciliation chart showing the closing