BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 23(1)(va)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi583Mumbai168Jaipur148Raipur97Ahmedabad72Chennai58Kolkata49Bangalore33Chandigarh32Hyderabad31Indore26Pune25Cochin14Jodhpur13Surat13Guwahati12Amritsar11Visakhapatnam7Lucknow5Varanasi5Patna4SC4Nagpur3Cuttack2Rajkot2Agra1

Key Topics

Section 40A(3)28Disallowance5Addition to Income5Section 133A4Section 143(3)4Section 14A4Section 44Deduction4Survey u/s 133A4Section 36(1)(va)

OBEETEE TEXTILES PVT. LTD.,MIRZAPUR vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTER, DELHI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 9/VNS/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi22 Nov 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Br Baskaran & Shri Amit Shuklaobeetee Textiles Pvt. Ltd. Vs. National Faceless 93, Ward-9, Assessment Centre, Bisunderpur, Civil Lines, Delhi Mirzapur, Uttarpradesh-231312 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaaco2596C Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Shri. S. K. GargFor Respondent: Shri. A. K. Singh
Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)

section 36(1)(va) Sr. No. Nature of Sum received Due date of The actual The actual fund from payment amount paid date of employees payment to the concerned authorities 1. Any Fund set 19242 21.05.2616 19242 20.05.2016 up under the provisions of ESI Act, 1948 2 Any Fund set 21652 21.06.2016 21652 20.06.2016 up under the provisions

THE MAHABIR JUTE MILLS LIMITED,GORAKHPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2 , GORAKHPUR

2

In the result, (i) the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 is partly allowed and for AY 2020-21 is treated as allowed

ITA 351/ALLD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Nov 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 4Section 40A(3)

23-11-2016. Further, the assessee has furnished tax audit report also before the AO and in the tax audit report, the tax auditor did not mention that there was violation of provisions of sec.40A(3) of the Act. Accordingly, we are of the view that there was no laxity on the part of the assessee in substantiating its explanations

DCIT,, GORAKHPUR vs. M/S MAHABIR JITE MILLS, LTD., GORAKHPUR

In the result, (i) the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 is partly allowed and for AY 2020-21 is treated as allowed

ITA 448/ALLD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Nov 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 4Section 40A(3)

23-11-2016. Further, the assessee has furnished tax audit report also before the AO and in the tax audit report, the tax auditor did not mention that there was violation of provisions of sec.40A(3) of the Act. Accordingly, we are of the view that there was no laxity on the part of the assessee in substantiating its explanations

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2 , GORAKHPUR vs. THE MAHABIR JUTE MILLS LIMITED, GORAKHPUR

In the result, (i) the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 is partly allowed and for AY 2020-21 is treated as allowed

ITA 217/ALLD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 4Section 40A(3)

23-11-2016. Further, the assessee has furnished tax audit report also before the AO and in the tax audit report, the tax auditor did not mention that there was violation of provisions of sec.40A(3) of the Act. Accordingly, we are of the view that there was no laxity on the part of the assessee in substantiating its explanations

THE MAHABIR JUTE MILLS LTD.,GORAKHPUR vs. ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, (i) the appeal of the assessee for AY 2009-10 is partly allowed and for AY 2020-21 is treated as allowed

ITA 13/VNS/2023[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Nov 2023AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran (Am) & Shri Amit Shukla (Jm)

Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 14ASection 4Section 40A(3)

23-11-2016. Further, the assessee has furnished tax audit report also before the AO and in the tax audit report, the tax auditor did not mention that there was violation of provisions of sec.40A(3) of the Act. Accordingly, we are of the view that there was no laxity on the part of the assessee in substantiating its explanations