MIRZA ARIF BEG,GORAKHPUR vs. ACIT, RANGE - 1, GORAKHPUR
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 100/VNS/2019[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi26 May 2022AY 2014-2015
Bench: Hon’Ble Sh.Vijay Pal Rao & Hon’Ble Sh. Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2014-15 Mirza Arif Beg, V. Commissioner Of Income Tax, H. No. 184-B, New Colony, New Range-1, Gorakhpur Beniganj Chowk, Jafra Bazar, Gorakhpur, U.P. Pan-Abxpb6421C (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Sh. Subhash Chand, Advocate Respondent By: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 26.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 26.05.2022
For Appellant: Sh. Subhash Chand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 54F
206 taxman
150. Thus, the learned AR has submitted that the additional evidence filed by the 2
Mirza Arif Beg
assessee is very much relevant to the claim of the deduction under section 54F of the Income Tax Act and the same may be admitted.
3. On the other hand, the learned DR has submitted that the assessee was having
