BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Demonetizationclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi221Chennai156Mumbai118Bangalore99Jaipur91Hyderabad80Kolkata69Ahmedabad50Surat40Visakhapatnam37Lucknow35Pune35Panaji32Chandigarh32Rajkot31Agra23Jodhpur18Cuttack18Indore13Patna12Amritsar10Dehradun10Raipur10Allahabad6Nagpur5Cochin4Jabalpur4Varanasi3Calcutta2Ranchi2Karnataka2Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 1445Section 69A5Section 69C4Section 142(1)3Demonetization3Addition to Income3Section 270A2Cash Deposit2Disallowance2Limitation/Time-bar

SINGHAL AGENCIES,AZAMGARH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(4), AZAMGARH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 27/VNS/2023[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Oct 2023AY 2017-2018
Section 144Section 246ASection 270A

disallowance @10% of the overall ‘shop expenses’ claimed by the assessee. 5. The facts in brief are that assessee is a partnership firm engaged in business of selling diesel, petrol & lubricants etc. The return of income was filed declaring income of Rs.2,12,780/- on 28/10/2017. The case was selected for scrutiny through CASS on the ground of abnormal increase

CHAMRU RAM,CHANDAULI vs. DC/ACIT, CIRCLE - 3, VARANASI

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 14/VNS/2023[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi05 Jan 2026
2
AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 145(3)Section 255(4)Section 69ASection 69C

demonetization period. The learned Assessing Officer has erred and acted illegally in not placing reliance on the same and erred and acted illegally in applying the provision of section 69A/69C of the I. T. Act on the excess amount and adding back Rs.17,19,275/- u/s 69A of the I. T. Act as well as Rs.9

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 01, VARANASI vs. PERFECT TECNO COUNSULTANTS PVT. LTD. , VARANASI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 139/VNS/2020[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi13 Apr 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year: 2017-18 Dy. Commissioner Of Income Perfect Techno Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Tax, Circle-1, Aayakarbhawan, V. N-1/65-A, Narrotam Nagar Colony, M A Road, Varanasi- Nagwa, Lanka Varanasi-221005,U.P. 221002,U.P. Pan:Aagcp3236N (Appellant) (Respondent) Revenue By: Sh. Amalendunath Mishra, Cit Dr Assessee By: Sh. Mohammad Ashraf, C.A. Date Of Hearing: 11.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 13.04.2023 O R D E R

For Appellant: Sh. Mohammad Ashraf, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. AmalenduNath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 115JSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250Section 68Section 69A

demonetization period” .The assessee did not co-operated before ld. AO during the course of assessment proceedings as no reply/explanations/ submissions/evidences etc. were filed by the assessee before the AO during assessment proceedings despite sufficient and adequate opportunity of being heard granted by the AO, and an ex- parte assessment order was passed by the AO u/s 144 to meet