BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ TDSclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai995Mumbai628Patna615Delhi600Pune534Bangalore486Kolkata269Hyderabad214Raipur210Nagpur187Chandigarh147Jaipur143Ahmedabad113Cochin68Cuttack68Lucknow61Visakhapatnam50Surat44Indore37Rajkot32Karnataka30Dehradun23Kerala23Amritsar20Panaji16Jodhpur11Guwahati10Ranchi7Agra7Jabalpur7SC7Allahabad5Varanasi5Telangana2Rajasthan1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 20115TDS4Section 201(1)3Limitation/Time-bar3Section 124(3)(a)2Section 124(2)2Section 250(1)2Section 562

RAMESH CHANDRA JAISWAL,GORAKHPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2 (5), GORAKHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 31/VNS/2023[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Dec 2025AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 143(3)Section 253(3)Section 56

TDS on the same have already been deducted by the bank appropriately but certificate for the same is not provided by the bank. I have set a request letter to bank for the confirmation of the same as on 22.04.2021 but no response received yet.” 2. This appeal has been filed beyond the time limit prescribed

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2 (1),, VARANASI vs. PROMINENT DATAMATICS MARKETING PVT. LTD., , VARANASI

ITA 135/VNS/2020[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi05 Jan 2026AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 124(1)(a)Section 124(2)Section 124(3)(a)Section 250(1)Section 255(4)Section 69A

condoning the delay citing the reasons for the delay in filing before the Delhi benches, if so advised. 8. In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed. 9. Order pronounced in the open court on 26.09.2023. (AMIT SHUKLA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated 26th September, 2023. 8. In view of the above discussion, I find that after the judgement

CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER,CHANDAULI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS - 1, VARANASI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 5/VNS/2023[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi05 Oct 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri. B. R. Baskaran & Shri Amit Shukla

For Appellant: Shri Arvind Shukla, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R
Section 201Section 201(1)

delay in filing of the appeals is condoned and the appeals are admitted for hearing. 4. The brief facts qua the issue involved are that the assessee, who is a Chief Medical Officer, Chandauli, was engaged by the Governor of U.P. for looking after the construction of CHC Building at Chandauli. As per the MoU, he was a Clearing

CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, ,CHANDAULI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, TDS - 1, VARANASI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 6/VNS/2023[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi05 Oct 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri. B. R. Baskaran & Shri Amit Shukla

For Appellant: Shri Arvind Shukla, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R
Section 201Section 201(1)

delay in filing of the appeals is condoned and the appeals are admitted for hearing. 4. The brief facts qua the issue involved are that the assessee, who is a Chief Medical Officer, Chandauli, was engaged by the Governor of U.P. for looking after the construction of CHC Building at Chandauli. As per the MoU, he was a Clearing

CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER,CHANDAULI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS - 1, VARANASI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 7/VNS/2023[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi05 Oct 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri. B. R. Baskaran & Shri Amit Shukla

For Appellant: Shri Arvind Shukla, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R
Section 201Section 201(1)

delay in filing of the appeals is condoned and the appeals are admitted for hearing. 4. The brief facts qua the issue involved are that the assessee, who is a Chief Medical Officer, Chandauli, was engaged by the Governor of U.P. for looking after the construction of CHC Building at Chandauli. As per the MoU, he was a Clearing