Search: condonation of delay

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 55clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(va)21 Section 139(1)14 Section 143(1)10 Section 143(3)7 Section 2(24)(x)6 Section 253(3)4 Deduction4 Addition to Income4 Section 43B

INDRA NARAYAN TRIPATHI,GORAKHPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE - 02,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 5/VNS/2020[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi04 Jul 2022AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri Ashutosh BhardwajFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. D.R

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 143(3)(ii)Section 253(3)Section 253(5)Section 52C(2)

condone the delay of 34 days in filing this appeal late beyond the time prescribed u/s 253(3) of the 1961 Act , and we proceed to decide the appeal on merits in accordance with law. It is well settled that if technicalities are pitted against justice, Courts will lean towards advancement of justice, unless malafide is at writ large

INDRA NARAYAN TRIPATHI,GORAKHPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE - 02,, GORAKHPUR

INDRA NARAYAN TRIPATHI,GORAKHPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE - 02,, GORAKHPUR

SUJIT KUMAR AGRAWAL (HUF),VARANASI vs. ACIT, CC, VARANASI

UMESH KUMAR JAISWAL,KUSHINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(4), KUSHINAGAR

M/S RUGS MART,VARANASI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 03, VARANASI

UTKARSH SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.,VARANASI vs. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

LAWKUSH SHARMA,SONEBHADRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3 (5), SONEBHADRA

BHUPENDRA NATH PANDEY,VARANASI vs. ACIT, R - 03, VARANASI