Search: condonation of delay

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 54clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(va)21 Section 139(1)14 Section 143(1)10 Section 2(24)(x)6 Section 143(3)6 Section 253(3)5 Deduction5 Addition to Income4 Section 43B

SUJIT KUMAR AGRAWAL (HUF),VARANASI vs. ACIT, CC, VARANASI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 28/VNS/2021[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Jul 2022AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharay: 2014-15 Sujit Kumar Agrawal (Huf) V Assistant Commissioner Of 72, Jawahar Nagar Extension Bhelupur, . Income Tax, Central Circle, Varanasi-221005, Uttar Pradesh Varanasi Pan-Aaohs5397C (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Sh. Asim Zafar, Adv Respondent By: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 07.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 07.07.2022 O R D E R

For Appellant: Sh. Asim Zafar, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 253(3)Section 4Section 68

condone the delay of six days’ in filing the present appeal. The assessee has raised the following grounds: “1. Because the ex-parte order dated 09.09.2021 passed by the Ld. CIT(A) was wholly erroneous, as the same had been passed under mis-conception that the dispute had already been settled, under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. 2. Because

SUJIT KUMAR AGRAWAL (HUF),VARANASI vs. ACIT, CC, VARANASI

SUJIT KUMAR AGRAWAL (HUF),VARANASI vs. ACIT, CC, VARANASI

UMESH KUMAR JAISWAL,KUSHINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(4), KUSHINAGAR

RADHEY SHYAM,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3), VARANASI

M/S RUGS MART,VARANASI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 03, VARANASI

UTKARSH SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.,VARANASI vs. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

LAWKUSH SHARMA,SONEBHADRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3 (5), SONEBHADRA

BHUPENDRA NATH PANDEY,VARANASI vs. ACIT, R - 03, VARANASI