UMESH KUMAR JAISWAL,KUSHINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(4), KUSHINAGAR
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 27/VNS/2021[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Jun 2022AY 2017-2018
Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Raoassessment Year: 2017-18 Umesh Kumar Jaiswal, V. Income Tax Officer, Prop. Ramagya Prasad & Sons, Ward-2(4), Kushinagar Jataha Road, Padrauna, Kushinagar, Uttar Pradesh Pan-Acdpj3729Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri. Ashish Bansal, Adv Respondent By: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 25.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 07.06.2022
For Appellant: Shri. Ashish Bansal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. D.R
Section 145(1)
delay of seven days in filing the appeal is condoned.
5. The assessee has raised the following grounds:-
1. Because of the CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in upholding the addition of Rs.
4,07,517/- made by the Ld. Assessing Officer on the basis of turnover of Rs. 18,97,16,297/- as erroneously estimated
