Search: condonation of delay

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(va)25 Section 139(1)18 Section 143(1)12 Section 2(24)(x)6 Deduction6 Section 43B5 Section 434 Addition to Income3 Section 143(3)

M.W.S. & CO.,BHADOHI vs. DY. C.I.T., RANGE - 1, VARANASI

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 24/VNS/2021[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi19 Apr 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-20 M.W.S. & Co., Naya Bazar V. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Road, Bhadohi-221401, Uttar Central Processing Centre (Cpc), Pradesh, India Bengaluru [Jurisdictional Assessing Pan-Aaffm2003E Officer Being Dy./Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Varanasi, U.P. (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43Section 43B

Delay condoned. In the present case we are concerned with the law as it stood prior to the amendment of section 43B

M.W.S. & CO.,BHADOHI vs. DY. C.I.T., RANGE - 1, VARANASI

M.W.S. & CO.,BHADOHI vs. DY. C.I.T., RANGE - 1, VARANASI

M.W.S. & CO.,BHADOHI vs. DY. C.I.T., RANGE - 1, VARANASI

BHUPENDRA NATH PANDEY,VARANASI vs. ACIT, R - 03, VARANASI

M/S RUGS MART,VARANASI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 03, VARANASI

LAWKUSH SHARMA,SONEBHADRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3 (5), SONEBHADRA

UTKARSH SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.,VARANASI vs. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI